MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Honda » Jazz » 2003

Honda Jazz MOT Results

Registered in 2003
58.4% pass rate
from 8,984 tests in 2021
(9.7% better than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda Jazz is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (12% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Stop lamp (48% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.056% fail on Headlamp levelling device (89% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (40% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.56% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.29% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.18% fail on Horn (50% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.011% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.19% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.18% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.011% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.17% fail on Direction indicators (93% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Flashing type (93% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.089% fail on Side repeaters (89% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.067% fail on Individual direction indicators (96% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.12% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (91% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp (91% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp (91% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.011% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 15% fail on Suspension (13% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (17% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (58% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (35% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (94% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Ball joint (43% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage (70% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.056% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (89% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.011% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.5% fail on Wheel bearings (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms (42% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint (81% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint dust cover (68% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Suspension arm (80% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (28% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.43% fail on Springs (89% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Coil springs (91% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Coil spring (92% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Mounting
      • 0.10% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.21% fail on Sub-frames (62% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.10% fail on Sub-frame (61% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Other suspension component (60% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.056% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.045% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint dust cover (81% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.067% fail on Shock absorbers (92% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Axles (65% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Axle
      • 0.011% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.011% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 9.6% fail on Brakes (32% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (16% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Brake performance (51% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance (21% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (19% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance (21% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.011% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.011% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (27% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (27% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.85% fail on Service brake imbalance (30% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.022% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.022% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.56% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (86% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on Rbt (sp) (85% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.26% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt (83% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.18% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.045% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.022% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.011% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.011% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (44% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (20% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (21% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.21% fail on Brake discs and drums (81% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Brake discs (81% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (81% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on Cable (87% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Linkage
        • 0.011% fail on Clevis joint
    • 0.79% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (43% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Anti-lock braking system (36% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Electronic stability control (90% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.24% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.11% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (79% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Pedal (71% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Hand lever (87% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.078% fail on Parking brake control (84% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Lever (83% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Hydraulic systems (78% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Brake fluid (75% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.033% fail on Flexible brake hoses (91% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.022% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.022% fail on Other braking system component
  • 9.4% fail on Visibility (17% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers (24% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Washers (19% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on View to rear (58% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Mirrors (57% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.10% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.7% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.0% fail on Catalyst emissions (28% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (30% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested (34% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.078% fail on Oxygen sensor (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.056% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.011% fail on NOx sensor
        • 0.033% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.36% fail on Compression ignition (65% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.10% fail on Emission control equipment (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.089% fail on Catalytic converter (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.011% fail on Oxygen sensor
        • 0.045% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (73% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.033% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.033% fail on Emissions not tested (83% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Fluid leaks (62% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Engine oil leaks (60% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.011% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.011% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.011% fail on Undertray
  • 6.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (34% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.011% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.011% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.61% fail on Transmission (81% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Drive shafts (81% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Joints (81% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.011% fail on Joints
      • 0.011% fail on Belts
    • 0.45% fail on Chassis
      • 0.43% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.011% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.37% fail on Bumpers (76% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Fuel system (55% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.12% fail on Body (54% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Panel
      • 0.045% fail on Other body component
    • 0.078% fail on Doors (88% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Other passenger's door (77% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.078% fail on Door condition (76% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.011% fail on Door condition
    • 0.078% fail on Cabs
      • 0.078% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.067% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.067% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.045% fail on Seats (81% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.033% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.033% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.022% fail on Floor
    • 0.011% fail on Load security
      • 0.011% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.011% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.011% fail on Undertray
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres (12% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Condition (22% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (55% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts (35% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Prescribed areas (41% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Condition
      • 0.033% fail on Requirements
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment
    • 0.30% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (78% better than other 2003 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (75% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Steering linkage components (70% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Track rod end (70% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint (87% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.11% fail on Electronic power steering (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Steering gear (97% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Steering rack (97% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Power steering
      • 0.011% fail on Operation
  • 0.82% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.82% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels (66% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment (65% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Honda Jazz (2001 - 2008)
    Clever interior redefined the small car. Most space efficient small car built. Very reliable first 3 - 4 years.

    Search Good Garages