Honda Jazz MOT Results
Registered in 200257.7% pass rate
from 8,229 tests in 2017
(15% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda Jazz is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(21% better than other 2002 cars)
- 8.1% fail on Stop lamp (26% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Position lamps
(16% better than other 2002 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Front lamps
- 0.57% fail on Rear lamps (71% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.073% fail on All position lamps
- 5.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (23% better than other 2002 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim (34% better than other 2002 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamps
(30% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp (28% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.012% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.44% fail on Battery (53% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(71% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Fog lamp (71% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Switch
-
0.32% fail on
Direction indicators
(88% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Flashing type
(88% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Side repeaters (73% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Individual lamps (94% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.012% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.32% fail on
Flashing type
(88% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Horn (56% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.085% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.049% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.012% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
18% fail on
Suspension
(19% better than other 2002 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Wheel bearings
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Front
-
5.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
- 0.073% fail on Condition
-
4.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(13% better than other 2002 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.75% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (29% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Linkage condition (84% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Attachment (83% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Condition
-
2.0% fail on
Macpherson strut
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
(54% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Component mounting (55% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Subframe mounting (62% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Spring mounting
-
1.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(73% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
(73% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (73% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Couplings
-
0.012% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.012% fail on Drive shafts
-
1.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
(73% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Front suspension joints (60% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Shock absorbers
(62% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.23% fail on Condition
- 0.012% fail on Attachment
-
0.15% fail on
Coil springs
(96% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Condition (98% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Location
-
0.097% fail on
Trailing arms
(70% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Condition
- 0.024% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (91% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Attachment
-
0.097% fail on
Axles
- 0.097% fail on Axle beam (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.073% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.049% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.012% fail on Condition
- 0.012% fail on Attachment
-
0.061% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(74% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (71% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.049% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.049% fail on Condition
- 0.036% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
0.024% fail on
Torsion bars
- 0.024% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Wheel bearings
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brakes
(28% better than other 2002 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
6.0% fail on
Components
- 5.4% fail on Pipes (26% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Hoses (41% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Cylinders (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.036% fail on Reservoirs (73% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Leaks
- 0.061% fail on Operation
- 0.024% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (80% better than other 2002 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Components
-
4.3% fail on
Brake performance
(51% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Front wheels
- 0.86% fail on Rear wheels (78% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Parking brake performance (84% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.60% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.036% fail on Brake operation
-
2.2% fail on
Hub components
(33% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Brake pads (26% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Brake discs (55% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.024% fail on Wheel cylinder
- 0.012% fail on Brake back plates
- 1.2% fail on ABS
- 0.27% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.18% fail on
Parking brake
(82% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Condition (82% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Service brake control components
(54% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Pedal
(54% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.012% fail on Condition
-
0.13% fail on
Pedal
(54% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Electronic stability system (89% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.012% fail on
Components
- 0.012% fail on Pipes
-
0.012% fail on
Components
-
6.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
8.6% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(8.8% better than other 2002 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Wipers
- 2.6% fail on Washers (28% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Windscreen (37% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Mirrors (68% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.036% fail on Bonnet (75% better than other 2002 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Tyres
(20% better than other 2002 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Tread depth (24% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Condition (20% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Size/type
- 0.19% fail on Valve stem
-
5.5% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(30% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Exhaust system (28% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Emissions
- 0.83% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.15% fail on
Fuel system
(82% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Cap (56% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Hose
-
1.2% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(57% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Body condition (38% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Vehicle structure
(63% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Chassis (63% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Doors
(78% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Passengers other (73% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Drivers (85% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Passengers front (85% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.061% fail on
Seats
(79% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Drivers (74% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Passengers
-
0.049% fail on
Load security
- 0.036% fail on Bootlid
- 0.012% fail on Tailgate
- 0.036% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.012% fail on Body security
-
1.2% fail on
Steering
(76% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.94% fail on
Steering system
(78% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Track rod end (74% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Steering rack (91% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.036% fail on Ball joint (87% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Drag link end
-
0.012% fail on
Other components
- 0.012% fail on Steering pivot point
- 0.17% fail on Locking devices (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.049% fail on
Power steering
(91% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.036% fail on
Steering control
- 0.036% fail on Steering lock
- 0.024% fail on Steering operation
-
0.94% fail on
Steering system
(78% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(73% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Seat belts
(71% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Prescribed areas (79% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Condition (41% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Attachment
- 0.012% fail on Requirements
-
0.36% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(79% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.35% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (78% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.74% fail on
Seat belts
(71% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.90% fail on Registration plate
-
0.21% fail on
Road Wheels
(54% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Attachment (49% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.036% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Honda Jazz (2001 - 2008)
Clever interior redefined the small car. Most space efficient small car built. Very reliable first 3 - 4 years.