Honda HR-V MOT Results

Registered in 2016
91.4% pass rate
from 7,171 tests in 2020
(31% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda HR-V is unusually good or bad.

  • 2.6% fail on Visibility
    • 2.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.40% fail on Washers (53% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.056% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.056% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.014% fail on View to rear
      • 0.014% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres (29% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.99% fail on Condition (47% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.028% fail on Size/type
  • 2.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (37% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.20% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.084% fail on Headlamps (83% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Headlamp (90% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.014% fail on Matched pair
    • 0.042% fail on Stop lamp (89% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.028% fail on Direction indicators (91% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Flashing type (91% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on Side repeaters (89% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.028% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.028% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.028% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.014% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.014% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.014% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.014% fail on Switch
    • 0.014% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.014% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.014% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 1.1% fail on Brakes (43% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Mechanical brake components (39% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Brake linings and pads (32% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Brake pads (32% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.11% fail on Pedal (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Brake performance (73% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Service brake performance (70% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Rbt (69% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.042% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.028% fail on Service brake performance (84% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.042% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.028% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.014% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.014% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.014% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.056% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.056% fail on Electronic parking brake (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.028% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.028% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.028% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 0.45% fail on Suspension
    • 0.26% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.014% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.028% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.014% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.028% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint dust cover (25 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Springs
      • 0.014% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.014% fail on Coil spring
  • 0.14% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.14% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.14% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.028% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.028% fail on Body
      • 0.028% fail on Other body component
    • 0.028% fail on Doors
      • 0.028% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.028% fail on Door condition
    • 0.014% fail on Transmission
      • 0.014% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.014% fail on Joints
    • 0.014% fail on Floor
    • 0.014% fail on Seats
      • 0.014% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.014% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.014% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 0.11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (71% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Exhaust emissions (69% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Spark ignition (70% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.042% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.014% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 0.056% fail on Compression ignition (68% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.014% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.098% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (61% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.084% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.084% fail on Condition
    • 0.014% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.042% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.042% fail on Attachment
  • 0.028% fail on Steering
    • 0.028% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.014% fail on Track rod end
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages