MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Honda » HR-V » 2016

Honda HR-V MOT Results

Registered in 2016
89.2% pass rate
from 6,926 tests in 2021
(36% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda HR-V is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.0% fail on Visibility
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers
    • 0.90% fail on Washers
    • 0.014% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.014% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.014% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.014% fail on View to rear
      • 0.014% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.2% fail on Tyres (43% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth (33% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 1.8% fail on Brakes (37% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (25% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.13% fail on Brake discs and drums (73% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Brake discs (73% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Brake performance (70% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance (75% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Rbt (75% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.072% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.029% fail on Service brake performance (91% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (69% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.072% fail on Rbt (sp) (67% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.029% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.029% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.14% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.14% fail on Electronic parking brake (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.058% fail on Electronic braking system (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.014% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.029% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 1.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (54% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.25% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.25% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.25% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.058% fail on Headlamps (92% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Headlamp (91% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Stop lamp (95% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Direction indicators (92% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Flashing type (92% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.014% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.029% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.014% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.014% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.014% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 0.87% fail on Suspension (58% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.27% fail on Shock absorbers (98% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Springs (89% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Coil springs (89% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Coil spring (89% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.072% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.058% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.014% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.043% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.029% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.014% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 0.22% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (74% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Exhaust emissions (75% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Compression ignition (66% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.087% fail on Spark ignition (82% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.087% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (70% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.014% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.12% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (60% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.072% fail on Condition
      • 0.029% fail on Requirements
    • 0.029% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.10% fail on Body, chassis, structure (81% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Body
      • 0.043% fail on Other body component
    • 0.043% fail on Doors
      • 0.029% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.029% fail on Door condition
      • 0.014% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.014% fail on Door condition
    • 0.014% fail on Seats
      • 0.014% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 0.072% fail on Steering (73% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.072% fail on Electronic power steering (20 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.058% fail on Road Wheels (69% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.058% fail on Attachment
  • 0.043% fail on Identification of the vehicle (80% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Registration plates (80% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.014% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.014% fail on Doors
      • 0.014% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages