Honda HR-V MOT Results

Registered in 2003
61.8% pass rate
from 662 tests in 2017
(21% better than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda HR-V is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (27% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (64% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Battery
    • 0.45% fail on Rear reflectors (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp (80% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Fog lamp (80% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 14% fail on Suspension (30% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage condition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
    • 4.7% fail on Prescribed areas (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Component mounting (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.76% fail on Rear
      • 0.45% fail on Front
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.91% fail on Tie bars/rods (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on Coil springs (86% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Suspension arms (90% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (93% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
    • 0.45% fail on Drive shafts (88% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Front drive shafts (88% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Constant velocity joints (88% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
    • 0.15% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.15% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.15% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 8.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.0% fail on Emissions (83% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.60% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.15% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.15% fail on Cap
  • 7.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.76% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.15% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.1% fail on Brakes (56% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Hydraulic systems (47% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Components (46% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Pipes
      • 0.30% fail on Leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Brake performance (72% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Rear wheels (76% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Front wheels (68% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Brake operation (12 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
    • 1.7% fail on Hub components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.30% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.15% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.60% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on ABS
    • 0.30% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.30% fail on Pedal
        • 0.15% fail on Condition
        • 0.15% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.15% fail on Restricted movement
  • 5.4% fail on Tyres (40% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth (48% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
    • 0.15% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
  • 2.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.91% fail on Engine mountings (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.60% fail on Chassis
    • 0.60% fail on Doors
      • 0.60% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.45% fail on Body condition
    • 0.30% fail on Seats
      • 0.30% fail on Drivers
  • 1.8% fail on Steering (64% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Steering system (63% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end (53% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.15% fail on Power steering
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
  • 0.76% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.76% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages