Honda HR-V MOT Results
Registered in 200260.5% pass rate
from 721 tests in 2021
(13% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda HR-V is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
7.2% fail on
Headlamps
(45% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Headlamp (59% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.83% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.28% fail on
Direction indicators
(88% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Flashing type
(88% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.28% fail on
Flashing type
(88% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (88% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.28% fail on Horn
- 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.14% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.14% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.14% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
7.2% fail on
Headlamps
(45% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
14% fail on
Suspension
-
6.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Ball joint
- 0.42% fail on Anti-roll bar (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 6.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (85% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Suspension arms
(82% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.28% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes (88% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.55% fail on
Springs
(85% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Coil springs
(84% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Coil spring (84% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Coil springs
(84% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.14% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.14% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
6.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
9.0% fail on
Visibility
- 4.9% fail on Washers
- 4.4% fail on Wipers
-
0.28% fail on
View to rear
- 0.28% fail on Mirrors
-
0.14% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.14% fail on Windscreen
-
9.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.2% fail on
Chassis
- 1.2% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.1% fail on
Transmission
(69% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Drive shafts
(71% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Joints (75% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.28% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.14% fail on Prop shaft
- 0.14% fail on Joints
-
0.97% fail on
Drive shafts
(71% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Engine mounting
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.14% fail on Bracket
-
0.42% fail on
Seats
- 0.28% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.14% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.28% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.28% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.28% fail on
Body
- 0.28% fail on Panel
-
0.28% fail on
Doors
-
0.28% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.28% fail on Door condition
-
0.28% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
6.9% fail on
Brakes
(51% better than other 2002 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Brake performance
(53% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.28% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.14% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.14% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.14% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(68% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Rbt (sp) (92% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.42% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(79% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(86% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.28% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(86% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt
- 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt
-
1.8% fail on
Service brake performance
- 2.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads
-
0.42% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.42% fail on Brake discs
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.42% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.42% fail on Lever
-
0.28% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.28% fail on Pedal
- 0.14% fail on Hand lever
-
0.14% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.14% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
3.7% fail on
Brake performance
(53% better than other 2002 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.7% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.97% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.69% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.28% fail on
Emission control equipment
(6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.14% fail on NOx sensor
- 0.14% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
- 0.14% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.28% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.28% fail on
Emission control equipment
(6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.14% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.14% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
6.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.9% fail on
Steering
-
4.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(69% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Track rod end (88% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(69% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Tyres
- 2.1% fail on Condition
- 1.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.28% fail on Size/type
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(58% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.97% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.42% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on Attachment
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.69% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.69% fail on Registration plates
-
0.14% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.14% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Honda HR-V (1999 - 2006)
Reliable, well-built urbanite with 4x4 looks and, in many cases, 4x4 hardware.