MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Honda » HR-V » 2002

Honda HR-V MOT Results

Registered in 2002
55.4% pass rate
from 1,168 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda HR-V is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.9% fail on Stop lamp (52% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Headlamps (55% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Headlamp (69% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.94% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.3% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.086% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.94% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (67% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.43% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.086% fail on Horn
    • 0.17% fail on Direction indicators (93% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Flashing type (93% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.17% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 15% fail on Suspension (18% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (40% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (68% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.086% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.086% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.086% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 6.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (99% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms (82% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint (84% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes (90% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.86% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.77% fail on Springs (77% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Coil springs (79% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Coil spring (82% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.086% fail on Mounting
      • 0.086% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.77% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.43% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.086% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.086% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.086% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.17% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.086% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.086% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.17% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.17% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.086% fail on Axles
      • 0.086% fail on Axle
  • 9.9% fail on Brakes (35% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.7% fail on Brake performance (67% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (72% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt (sp) (89% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (66% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (65% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance (60% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.086% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.60% fail on Parking brake performance (66% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt (75% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.34% fail on Parking brake performance (77% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.086% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.086% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.086% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.086% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.086% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.26% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (88% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Rbt (sp) (92% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.086% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.086% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.086% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.68% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.51% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.17% fail on Brake drums (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.86% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.34% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.34% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.26% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.26% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.26% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.26% fail on Lever
    • 0.086% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.086% fail on Leaks
    • 0.086% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 9.3% fail on Visibility
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 4.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.17% fail on View to rear
      • 0.17% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.086% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.086% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.086% fail on Windscreen
  • 8.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (48% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.17% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.086% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.086% fail on Oxygen sensor
        • 0.086% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.34% fail on Compression ignition (70% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.086% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.086% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.086% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.086% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.086% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.26% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.26% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (38% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.0% fail on Transmission (74% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Drive shafts (82% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Joints (86% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.34% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.17% fail on Joints
        • 0.086% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.086% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 0.77% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.77% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.43% fail on Engine mounting (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Engine mounting condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Bracket
    • 0.34% fail on Chassis
      • 0.34% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.34% fail on Doors
      • 0.34% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.34% fail on Door condition
    • 0.34% fail on Seats
      • 0.26% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.086% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.26% fail on Body
      • 0.17% fail on Panel
      • 0.086% fail on Pillar
    • 0.086% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.086% fail on Floor
  • 5.0% fail on Tyres (31% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.086% fail on Size/type
  • 4.5% fail on Steering
    • 4.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.17% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.17% fail on Power steering
      • 0.086% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.086% fail on Other components
  • 2.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
      • 0.086% fail on Requirements
    • 0.26% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (85% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.77% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.77% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages