Honda HR-V MOT Results

Registered in 1999
55.4% pass rate
from 1,028 tests in 2017
(8.3% better than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda HR-V is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.2% fail on Headlamp aim (38% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 8.9% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Battery
    • 0.49% fail on Rear fog lamp (69% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Fog lamp (67% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Switch
    • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.19% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.19% fail on Horn
    • 0.097% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Prescribed areas (70% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 9.7% fail on Component mounting (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.39% fail on Spring mounting
    • 8.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (64% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 3.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage condition (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Attachment
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Coil springs
      • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms (74% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (80% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
      • 0.097% fail on Attachment
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.78% fail on Wheel bearings (58% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Front
      • 0.29% fail on Rear (74% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.58% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.097% fail on Attachment
    • 0.68% fail on Drive shafts (83% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Front drive shafts (82% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Constant velocity joints (85% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.097% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.39% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.39% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.19% fail on Front suspension joints (87% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.097% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.097% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 12% fail on Brakes (29% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.4% fail on Components
        • 7.0% fail on Pipes (68% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.68% fail on Hoses (62% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.097% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.39% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.29% fail on Leaks
      • 0.097% fail on Operation
    • 4.1% fail on Brake performance (57% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.78% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.19% fail on Rear wheels (95% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance (86% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.19% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.19% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.39% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.39% fail on Pedal
        • 0.29% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.097% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on ABS (72% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 8.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.39% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.29% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.19% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (28% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Emissions (34% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust system (36% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on Cap (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 5.8% fail on Tyres (29% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition (45% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Size/type
  • 4.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.8% fail on Body condition
    • 0.88% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.88% fail on Chassis
    • 0.68% fail on Seats
      • 0.39% fail on Drivers
      • 0.29% fail on Passengers
    • 0.58% fail on Engine mountings (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Load security
      • 0.097% fail on Bootlid
      • 0.097% fail on Loading door
    • 0.097% fail on Doors
      • 0.097% fail on Drivers
  • 3.8% fail on Steering
    • 3.8% fail on Steering system
      • 3.8% fail on Track rod end (66% worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 3.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (37% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
    • 0.49% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (72% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (76% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.49% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.49% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages