Honda HR-V MOT Results

Registered in 1999
52.1% pass rate
from 681 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda HR-V is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.2% fail on Headlamps (97% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Headlamp (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 7.0% fail on Stop lamp (49% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.0% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.15% fail on Horn
    • 0.15% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 8.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint (200% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.44% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.15% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.1% fail on Suspension arms (59% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.44% fail on Pins and bushes (78% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint (81% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.5% fail on Springs
      • 1.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.3% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.15% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.44% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.29% fail on Wheel bearings (80% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 11% fail on Visibility (38% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Wipers (49% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.73% fail on Condition of glass (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Windscreen (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on View to rear
      • 0.44% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.15% fail on Driver's view
  • 9.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.6% fail on Chassis
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.0% fail on Engine mounting (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Engine mounting condition (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Bracket
    • 0.88% fail on Transmission (74% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Drive shafts (77% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Joints (81% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.15% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.15% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.15% fail on Joints
    • 0.88% fail on Body
      • 0.59% fail on Panel
      • 0.29% fail on Other body component
    • 0.59% fail on Seats
      • 0.44% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.15% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.44% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.44% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.15% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.15% fail on Doors
      • 0.15% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition
    • 0.15% fail on Floor
    • 0.15% fail on Cabs
      • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 9.5% fail on Brakes (33% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.8% fail on Brake performance (53% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (74% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Rbt (sp) (76% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.88% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.73% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (73% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Rbt (sp) (83% better than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.44% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.29% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance (81% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Rbt (80% better than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.59% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.59% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.73% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.44% fail on Pedal
      • 0.29% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.73% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.73% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.15% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.15% fail on Lever
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 7.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 5.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.88% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.44% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.29% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.15% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.44% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 3.8% fail on Steering
    • 3.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.8% fail on Track rod end (84% worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 2.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (44% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
  • 0.88% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.88% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages