Honda FR-V MOT Results

Registered in 2009
65.9% pass rate
from 1,432 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda FR-V is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (21% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.070% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps (56% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (61% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.70% fail on Direction indicators (61% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Flashing type (61% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.14% fail on Individual direction indicators (87% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.070% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.070% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 9.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (70% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.14% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes (92% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Shock absorbers (76% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.070% fail on Springs
      • 0.070% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.070% fail on Coil spring
  • 8.9% fail on Brakes
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (45% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (91% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Brake pads (90% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.42% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.42% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance (57% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (56% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.98% fail on Service brake imbalance (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.070% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.35% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.35% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.21% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (87% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Rbt (sp) (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance (80% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Rbt (79% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.070% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.070% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.070% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.63% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.35% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal
    • 0.35% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.35% fail on Brake fluid (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.28% fail on Lever
    • 0.21% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 8.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Condition (48% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
  • 5.4% fail on Visibility
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers (57% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Washers (55% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.14% fail on View to rear
      • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.070% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.070% fail on Windscreen
  • 1.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (52% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (49% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.77% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.35% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (65% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.63% fail on Compression ignition (58% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (65% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.42% fail on Transmission (74% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Drive shafts (73% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Joints (72% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Body
      • 0.070% fail on Panel
    • 0.070% fail on Doors
      • 0.070% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.070% fail on Door condition
  • 0.98% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.70% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.42% fail on Condition
      • 0.28% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Requirements
    • 0.28% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.63% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.63% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.49% fail on Steering (74% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Steering linkage components (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Track rod end (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.42% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.42% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Honda FR-V (2004 - 2009)
    Clever way to carry 6 in 2 rows, like a Multipla, but with Honda quality. 1.8, 2.0 and 2.2 all chain cam engines.

    Search Good Garages