Honda FR-V MOT Results
Registered in 200867.7% pass rate
from 1,970 tests in 2017
(13% better than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda FR-V is unusually good or bad.
-
12% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(34% better than other 2008 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
4.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.1% fail on Front lamps
- 0.20% fail on Rear lamps (82% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (44% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Stop lamp (45% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Headlamps
(75% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Headlamp (74% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Direction indicators
(83% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Flashing type
(83% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.051% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.30% fail on
Flashing type
(83% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.20% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.10% fail on Battery
-
11% fail on
Suspension
(17% better than other 2008 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Linkage condition (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Condition (13 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.91% fail on
Suspension arms
(63% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (66% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Condition
- 0.051% fail on Attachment
- 0.56% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.36% fail on
Shock absorbers
(73% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.30% fail on Component mounting (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.20% fail on Front
- 0.051% fail on Rear
-
0.15% fail on
Coil springs
(97% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Condition (97% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Drive shafts
(92% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Front drive shafts
(92% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Constant velocity joints (92% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.15% fail on
Front drive shafts
(92% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.051% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.051% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.051% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.051% fail on Condition
-
9.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Tyres
- 5.1% fail on Condition (37% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Tread depth
- 0.20% fail on Valve stem
- 0.15% fail on Size/type
-
6.5% fail on
Brakes
-
3.0% fail on
Hub components
- 2.9% fail on Brake pads
- 0.15% fail on Brake discs (79% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Brake calipers
-
2.7% fail on
Brake performance
- 1.4% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.1% fail on Front wheels
- 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance (78% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.10% fail on Brake operation
-
0.71% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.71% fail on Condition
-
0.41% fail on
Service brake control components
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Pedal
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Anti-slip (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Pedal
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(85% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Operation
-
0.10% fail on
Components
(91% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.051% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.051% fail on Leaks
- 0.20% fail on ABS
- 0.20% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.10% fail on Electronic stability system
-
3.0% fail on
Hub components
-
6.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.9% fail on Wipers (60% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Washers
- 0.15% fail on Windscreen
- 0.051% fail on Mirrors
-
1.0% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(64% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Exhaust system (53% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Emissions
- 0.051% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.71% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.51% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.30% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Requirements (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Attachment
-
0.20% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.20% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.51% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.36% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.36% fail on Registration plate
-
0.30% fail on
Steering
(81% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Steering system
(86% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Track rod end (84% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Steering rack
-
0.051% fail on
Power steering
- 0.051% fail on Operation
- 0.051% fail on Locking devices
-
0.20% fail on
Steering system
(86% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.30% fail on Attachment
-
0.10% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(84% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.051% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.051% fail on Chassis
-
0.051% fail on
Doors
- 0.051% fail on Drivers
-
0.051% fail on
Vehicle structure
Read the Honest John Review
-
Honda FR-V (2004 - 2009)
Clever way to carry 6 in 2 rows, like a Multipla, but with Honda quality. 1.8, 2.0 and 2.2 all chain cam engines.