Honda FR-V MOT Results

Registered in 2005
56.7% pass rate
from 2,684 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda FR-V is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.4% fail on Position lamps (52% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Front lamps (83% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Rear lamps (75% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on All position lamps
    • 8.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (36% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (57% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (71% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (70% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Direction indicators (64% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Flashing type (64% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Individual lamps (73% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.75% fail on Battery
    • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp (73% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Fog lamp (72% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.037% fail on Switch
    • 0.22% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.22% fail on Lamp (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.037% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.037% fail on Horn
    • 0.037% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Anti-roll bars (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (81% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage condition (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 3.2% fail on Suspension arms (26% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (25% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas (70% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Component mounting (97% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 1.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.52% fail on Drive shafts (85% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Front drive shafts (85% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Constant velocity joints (86% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.037% fail on Couplings
    • 0.34% fail on Coil springs (93% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Condition (93% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.26% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.075% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Shock absorbers (81% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Wheel bearings (90% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Front (88% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Rear (92% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.037% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.037% fail on Condition
    • 0.037% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.037% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.037% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.037% fail on Condition
    • 0.037% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.037% fail on Condition
    • 0.037% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 6.0% fail on Hub components (72% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Brake discs (49% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.075% fail on Brake back plates
    • 4.6% fail on Brake performance (33% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.89% fail on Parking brake performance (76% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.037% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake (75% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Condition (88% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Hydraulic systems (81% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Components (89% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Hoses (62% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.037% fail on Pipes
        • 0.037% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.22% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.71% fail on Service brake control components (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Anti-slip (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on Condition
    • 0.63% fail on Restricted movement (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on ABS
    • 0.22% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 9.4% fail on Tyres
    • 5.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.075% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.037% fail on Size/type
  • 8.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers (25% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.52% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.37% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (47% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust system (36% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions (35% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.075% fail on Fuel system (86% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Cap
  • 1.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.78% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
      • 0.075% fail on Requirements
      • 0.037% fail on Attachment
    • 0.45% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (68% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (68% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (72% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Steering system (76% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Track rod end (74% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.037% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.22% fail on Power steering
      • 0.19% fail on Operation
      • 0.037% fail on Other components
    • 0.037% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.86% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.41% fail on Body condition
    • 0.11% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.11% fail on Chassis
    • 0.11% fail on Doors (74% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.037% fail on Drivers
    • 0.11% fail on Load security
      • 0.075% fail on Bootlid
      • 0.037% fail on Tailgate
    • 0.075% fail on Seats
      • 0.075% fail on Drivers
      • 0.037% fail on Passengers
    • 0.037% fail on Body security
  • 0.52% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.52% fail on Attachment
  • 0.48% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.48% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.037% fail on Towbars
    • 0.037% fail on Vehicle structure
Read the Honest John Review

  • Honda FR-V (2004 - 2009)
    Clever way to carry 6 in 2 rows, like a Multipla, but with Honda quality. 1.8, 2.0 and 2.2 all chain cam engines.

    Search Good Garages