Honda CR-Z MOT Results

Registered in 2010
80.4% pass rate
from 1,390 tests in 2020
(45% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda CR-Z is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.2% fail on Brakes
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs (72% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.36% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.14% fail on Rbt
          • 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.36% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.29% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.22% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.14% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.072% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.072% fail on Brake fluid
  • 4.3% fail on Visibility
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.14% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.14% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.072% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.2% fail on Suspension (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.072% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.43% fail on Springs (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Coil springs (89% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Coil spring (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Shock absorbers (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Suspension arms (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.22% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.072% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.072% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 2.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Headlamp aim (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Headlamp aim (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.86% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (59% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Headlamps (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Direction indicators (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Flashing type (77% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.14% fail on Individual direction indicators (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Position lamps (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Position lamp (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.14% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.072% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 0.94% fail on Body, chassis, structure (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Exhaust system (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Doors
      • 0.22% fail on Driver's door (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.072% fail on Door condition
    • 0.14% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.072% fail on Transmission
      • 0.072% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.072% fail on Joints
    • 0.072% fail on Seats
      • 0.072% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.072% fail on Undertray
  • 0.86% fail on Steering (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.79% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.072% fail on Power steering
      • 0.072% fail on Operation
  • 0.50% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.50% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.29% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.14% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.22% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (92% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Exhaust emissions (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Spark ignition (86% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.072% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 0.072% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.072% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages