Honda CR-Z MOT Results

Registered in 2010

77.7% pass rate

from 1,319 tests in 2021

(39% better than other 2010 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda CR-Z is unusually good or bad.

7.9% fail on Brakes
- 4.4% fail on Brake performance
  - 2.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
    - 2.1% fail on Rbt
      - 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.23% fail on Plate brake tester (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      - 0.23% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      - 0.91% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 0.45% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.15% fail on Rbt (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      - 0.076% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.076% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 0.076% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 4.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 3.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.9% fail on Brake pads
    - 0.076% fail on Brake linings
  - 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.4% fail on Brake discs
- 0.99% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.76% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  - 0.30% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.076% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.076% fail on Hand lever
- 0.076% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.076% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.076% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.076% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
6.5% fail on Suspension (51% better than other 2010 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.30% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.076% fail on Linkage
- 1.1% fail on Springs (79% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Coil springs (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    - 1.1% fail on Coil spring (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.076% fail on Mounting
- 0.53% fail on Suspension arms (87% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.23% fail on Ball joint (89% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes (91% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.076% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.076% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.23% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.076% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.076% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.076% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.076% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.076% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.076% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
4.0% fail on Visibility
- 2.9% fail on Wipers
- 1.1% fail on Washers (61% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.076% fail on View to rear
  - 0.076% fail on Mirrors
3.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (70% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (56% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (51% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (65% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Headlamps (80% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.45% fail on Headlamp (84% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.076% fail on Headlamp levelling device
  - 0.076% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.30% fail on Direction indicators (85% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.30% fail on Flashing type (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.30% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.30% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.23% fail on Horn
  - 0.076% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.23% fail on Stop lamp (92% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.15% fail on Reversing lamps
  - 0.15% fail on Reversing lamps
3.1% fail on Tyres (49% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth (37% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (60% better than other 2010 cars)
2.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (38% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.68% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.61% fail on Driver's door (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.61% fail on Door condition (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.15% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.15% fail on Door condition
- 0.076% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.076% fail on Hose
- 0.076% fail on Bumpers
- 0.076% fail on Seats
  - 0.076% fail on Driver's seat
0.91% fail on Steering (62% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Steering linkage components (53% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.76% fail on Track rod end (58% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.15% fail on Locking devices (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
0.91% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (74% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Exhaust emissions (75% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.76% fail on Spark ignition (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.45% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.076% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  - 0.076% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.076% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.076% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.076% fail on Engine oil leaks
0.68% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.68% fail on Registration plates
0.53% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.53% fail on Attachment
0.23% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (75% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.23% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp