Honda CR-V MOT Results
Registered in 201790.2% pass rate
from 12,141 tests in 2021
(24% better than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda CR-V is unusually good or bad.
-
3.1% fail on
Visibility
(15% better than other 2017 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Wipers
- 0.44% fail on Washers (54% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.12% fail on Windscreen
-
0.016% fail on
View to rear
- 0.016% fail on Mirrors
-
2.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.43% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Headlamps
(50% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp (73% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.11% fail on Stop lamp (68% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (60% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Rear reflectors (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.058% fail on
Direction indicators
(76% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.058% fail on
Flashing type
(76% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Side repeaters (82% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.058% fail on
Flashing type
(76% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.058% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.058% fail on Trailer electrical socket (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0082% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.0082% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.0082% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
2.0% fail on
Tyres
(43% better than other 2017 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Condition (33% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Tread depth (58% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Size/type
-
1.6% fail on
Brakes
(23% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.87% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(41% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(33% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Brake pads (33% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(88% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Brake discs (88% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0082% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.0082% fail on Cable
-
0.83% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(33% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Pedal (9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Hand lever (140% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Brake performance
(56% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Service brake performance
(53% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt
(56% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.0082% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.0082% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt
(56% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(67% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Rbt (sp) (72% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0082% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.025% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.025% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.025% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.025% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.016% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.016% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.016% fail on
Rbt
- 0.016% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.016% fail on
Rbt
-
0.13% fail on
Service brake performance
(53% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Parking brake control
(160% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.016% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.0082% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.016% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.0082% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.0082% fail on Servos
-
0.0082% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.0082% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.87% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(41% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.39% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.24% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.22% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.0082% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0082% fail on Particulate filter
- 0.0082% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.15% fail on
Spark ignition
(52% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.0082% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.0082% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.24% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.033% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.033% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.39% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.30% fail on
Suspension
(66% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.041% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.033% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.033% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0082% fail on Linkage
- 0.0082% fail on Ball joint
-
0.099% fail on
Suspension arms
(57% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.099% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.033% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.033% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.0082% fail on
Springs
-
0.0082% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.0082% fail on Coil spring
-
0.0082% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.0082% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.0082% fail on Ball joint
-
0.0082% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.0082% fail on Accumulator
-
0.12% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
0.15% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.15% fail on Registration plates
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(48% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.074% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.066% fail on Condition
- 0.0082% fail on Requirements
- 0.049% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.074% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.091% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(71% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Transmission
-
0.033% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.033% fail on Joints
-
0.033% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.025% fail on
Doors
-
0.025% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.025% fail on Door condition
-
0.025% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.0082% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.0082% fail on Bumpers
-
0.0082% fail on
Towbar
- 0.0082% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.0082% fail on
Seats
- 0.0082% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.033% fail on
Transmission
-
0.066% fail on
Road Wheels
(59% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Attachment
-
0.041% fail on
Steering
(73% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.016% fail on Steering rack
-
0.016% fail on
Steering linkage components
(84% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0082% fail on Track rod end
- 0.0082% fail on Locking devices
-
0.0082% fail on
Motorcycle derived steering systems
- 0.0082% fail on Head bearings
-
0.016% fail on
Steering gear
Read the Honest John Review
-
Honda CR-V (2012 - 2018)
1.6 i-DTEC is punchy and efficient, massive boot and a spacious cabin for five adults, superb build quality edges the CR-V into premium territory.