Honda CR-V MOT Results
Registered in 201689.7% pass rate
from 14,435 tests in 2021
(37% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda CR-V is unusually good or bad.
-
3.2% fail on
Visibility
(20% better than other 2016 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Wipers
- 0.66% fail on Washers (41% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.042% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.042% fail on Windscreen
-
0.021% fail on
View to rear
- 0.021% fail on Mirrors
- 0.0069% fail on Bonnet
-
2.3% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(33% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.021% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.42% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(120% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(120% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(120% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Headlamps
(43% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Headlamp (74% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.18% fail on Stop lamp (71% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (68% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.048% fail on
Direction indicators
(87% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.048% fail on
Flashing type
(87% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Side repeaters (87% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0069% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.0069% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.048% fail on
Flashing type
(87% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.021% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.014% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.0069% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.014% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.014% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.0069% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.0069% fail on Switch
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
2.1% fail on
Brakes
(24% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(37% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(24% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads (24% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0069% fail on Brake linings
-
0.083% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.083% fail on Brake discs (83% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(24% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Brake performance
(42% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Service brake performance
(54% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Rbt
(53% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Service brake performance (46% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Service brake imbalance (82% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Rbt
(53% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.12% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.028% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.0069% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.055% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.035% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.021% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(73% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.0069% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.0069% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.0069% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.0069% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.021% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(73% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.035% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.035% fail on
Rbt
- 0.035% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.035% fail on
Rbt
-
0.19% fail on
Service brake performance
(54% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Pedal (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Hand lever
-
0.21% fail on
Parking brake control
(85% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Lever (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.028% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.021% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.0069% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.021% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.014% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.0069% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.021% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(37% better than other 2016 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Tyres
(48% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Condition (41% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Tread depth (60% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Size/type
-
0.46% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(45% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(43% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.30% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.028% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.014% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (80% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Spark ignition
(75% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (62% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0069% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
0.34% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.0069% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.0069% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.46% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(43% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Suspension
(86% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.048% fail on Ball joint
- 0.048% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.035% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.035% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.0069% fail on Linkage
- 0.062% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.035% fail on
Suspension arms
(93% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Pins and bushes (89% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0069% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.014% fail on
Springs
(99% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.014% fail on
Coil springs
(99% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0069% fail on Coil spring
- 0.0069% fail on Mounting
-
0.014% fail on
Coil springs
(99% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0069% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.0069% fail on Ball joint
-
0.18% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
0.12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.048% fail on
Doors
-
0.035% fail on
Front passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0069% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.0069% fail on Door condition
-
0.0069% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.0069% fail on Door condition
-
0.035% fail on
Front passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.035% fail on
Transmission
(84% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.028% fail on
Drive shafts
(86% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Joints (86% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0069% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.0069% fail on Prop shaft
-
0.028% fail on
Drive shafts
(86% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0069% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.0069% fail on Bumpers
-
0.0069% fail on
Towbar
- 0.0069% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.0069% fail on
Body
- 0.0069% fail on Other body component
- 0.0069% fail on Undertray
-
0.048% fail on
Doors
-
0.10% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(51% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Registration plates (55% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0069% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.076% fail on
Steering
(72% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.048% fail on
Steering linkage components
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.042% fail on Track rod end (80% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0069% fail on Locking devices
-
0.014% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.014% fail on Steering rack
- 0.014% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.048% fail on
Steering linkage components
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.076% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(73% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.069% fail on
Seat belts
(58% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Condition (65% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Requirements
- 0.0069% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.069% fail on
Seat belts
(58% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.069% fail on
Road Wheels
(63% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Attachment (60% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Honda CR-V (2012 - 2018)
1.6 i-DTEC is punchy and efficient, massive boot and a spacious cabin for five adults, superb build quality edges the CR-V into premium territory.