Honda CR-V MOT Results

Registered in 2016
91.2% pass rate
from 15,141 tests in 2020
(29% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda CR-V is unusually good or bad.

  • 3.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (30% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (32% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Headlamps (64% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Headlamp (76% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.013% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.079% fail on Rear reflectors (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.066% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (76% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.046% fail on Stop lamp (88% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.020% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.013% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.0066% fail on Horn
    • 0.033% fail on Direction indicators (89% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Flashing type (89% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.0066% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.013% fail on Position lamps (92% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Position lamp (92% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0066% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0066% fail on Switch
    • 0.0066% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.0066% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 1.9% fail on Visibility (31% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Wipers (29% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Washers (48% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.099% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.099% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.086% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.020% fail on View to rear
      • 0.020% fail on Mirrors
  • 1.7% fail on Brakes (17% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Mechanical brake components (48% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Brake linings and pads (45% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on Brake pads (44% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Brake discs and drums (83% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.040% fail on Brake discs (83% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.0066% fail on Cable
        • 0.0066% fail on Lever
    • 0.45% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Pedal (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Hand lever (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Parking brake control (200% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Brake performance (48% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Service brake performance (61% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.086% fail on Rbt (62% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.086% fail on Service brake performance (51% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0066% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0066% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.066% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.053% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.013% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.033% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.026% fail on Rbt
          • 0.020% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0066% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.0066% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0066% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.020% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.020% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.020% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.013% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.013% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.046% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.020% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.013% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.0066% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.013% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.013% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 1.6% fail on Tyres (53% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Condition (46% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Tread depth (67% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.092% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.026% fail on Size/type
  • 0.24% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (37% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.17% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.0066% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0066% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.0066% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.0066% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.0066% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.086% fail on Spark ignition (54% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.066% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.013% fail on Catalyst emissions (80% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0066% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.15% fail on Suspension (75% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.086% fail on Shock absorbers (52% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.013% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.013% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.013% fail on Suspension arms (91% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0066% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.0066% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.0066% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0066% fail on Sub-frame
  • 0.13% fail on Identification of the vehicle (47% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Registration plates (47% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.11% fail on Body, chassis, structure (63% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.046% fail on Transmission
      • 0.046% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.046% fail on Joints
    • 0.026% fail on Doors
      • 0.026% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.026% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0066% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.0066% fail on Door condition
    • 0.020% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.0066% fail on Body
      • 0.0066% fail on Other body component
    • 0.0066% fail on Seats
      • 0.0066% fail on Driver's seat
  • 0.099% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (61% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.073% fail on Seat belts (55% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.059% fail on Condition (61% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Requirements
    • 0.026% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (70% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.026% fail on Road Wheels (82% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.026% fail on Attachment (70% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.020% fail on Steering (84% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Steering linkage components (85% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.0066% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.0066% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0066% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • Honda CR-V (2012 - 2018)
    1.6 i-DTEC is punchy and efficient, massive boot and a spacious cabin for five adults, superb build quality edges the CR-V into premium territory.

    Search Good Garages