Honda CR-V MOT Results

Registered in 2010
82.8% pass rate
from 9,374 tests in 2017
(41% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda CR-V is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.4% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Position lamps (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Rear lamps (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Front lamps (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (59% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (57% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (45% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Headlamp (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Headlamp levelling device (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.043% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on Headlamp levelling device (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.011% fail on Switch
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators (25% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type (25% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Individual lamps (36% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.096% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.011% fail on Switch
    • 0.42% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.42% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.064% fail on Battery
    • 0.032% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.021% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.011% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.011% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.011% fail on Switch
    • 0.011% fail on Horn
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth (57% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Valve stem (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Size/type
  • 3.7% fail on Brakes (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.27% fail on Brake discs (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.021% fail on Brake linings
    • 0.50% fail on Brake performance (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Parking brake performance (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Rear wheels (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Front wheels (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.021% fail on Parking brake operation (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.011% fail on Gradient hand brake
    • 0.44% fail on Service brake control components (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Anti-slip (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic systems (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Components (77% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.043% fail on Hoses
        • 0.043% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.011% fail on Valves
      • 0.043% fail on Leaks
      • 0.011% fail on Operation
    • 0.11% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.011% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.011% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.011% fail on Cable
    • 0.011% fail on ABS
  • 3.1% fail on Driver's view of the road (35% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Wipers (22% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Washers (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.011% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.5% fail on Suspension (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Condition (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Anti-roll bars (43% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (51% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.032% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.021% fail on Attachment
    • 0.096% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.085% fail on Condition (97% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Location
    • 0.085% fail on Suspension arms (93% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment
    • 0.064% fail on Drive shafts (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Front drive shafts (91% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.064% fail on Constant velocity joints (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.021% fail on Macpherson strut (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.011% fail on Suspension unit
  • 0.58% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (59% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Exhaust system (58% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.096% fail on Cap
      • 0.032% fail on System
      • 0.011% fail on Pipe
    • 0.043% fail on Emissions (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.31% fail on Steering (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Steering system (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Track rod end (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.011% fail on Free play
        • 0.011% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.011% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.011% fail on Other components
        • 0.011% fail on Steering component
    • 0.096% fail on Power steering
      • 0.075% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Operation
  • 0.21% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment
  • 0.19% fail on Registration plates and VIN (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Registration plate (56% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.11% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.064% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Seat belts (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Condition (82% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.043% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Body condition
    • 0.011% fail on Doors
      • 0.011% fail on Passengers other
  • 0.021% fail on Towbars (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.021% fail on Towbar (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Honda CR-V (2007 - 2012)
    Roomy and versatile. Very comfortable, pleasant and relaxing to drive. not at all cumbersome. 2.2 i-CTDI diesel is excellent.

    Search Good Garages