MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Honda » CR-V » 2010

Honda CR-V MOT Results

Registered in 2010
76.4% pass rate
from 10,675 tests in 2021
(37% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda CR-V is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (19% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp (42% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp levelling device (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.0094% fail on Matched pair
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp (17% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators (25% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.10% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (45% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.48% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.48% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.0094% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.0094% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 0.19% fail on Electrical equipment (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.037% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.0094% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.10% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.10% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.084% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.047% fail on Reversing lamps (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Reversing lamps (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.019% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.019% fail on Switch
  • 5.5% fail on Suspension (59% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (16% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.71% fail on Ball joint dust cover (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.028% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0094% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0094% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.64% fail on Springs (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Coil springs (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Coil spring (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0094% fail on Mounting
    • 0.57% fail on Suspension arms (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0094% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.51% fail on Shock absorbers (39% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Wheel bearings (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Other suspension component (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0094% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0094% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.047% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.037% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.019% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0094% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0094% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.019% fail on Sub-frames (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0094% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.0094% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres (33% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth (32% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Condition (35% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Size/type (69% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 3.7% fail on Brakes (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (29% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.0094% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.51% fail on Brake discs and drums (55% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Brake discs (55% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0094% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.0094% fail on Lever
    • 0.79% fail on Brake performance (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt (sp) (82% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.019% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt (90% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance (90% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.019% fail on Service brake imbalance (95% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0094% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0094% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance (80% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Rbt (84% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.0094% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.028% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.019% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0094% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.0094% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0094% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.084% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.056% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on Rbt (sp) (90% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.056% fail on Service brake imbalance (87% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.0094% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.63% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.29% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Anti-lock braking system (46% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.22% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.22% fail on Lever
    • 0.028% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0094% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.019% fail on Rigid brake pipes (97% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.019% fail on Flexible brake hoses (83% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 3.7% fail on Visibility (31% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on View to rear (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Mirrors (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.028% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.028% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.019% fail on Driver's view
  • 1.5% fail on Steering (36% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Track rod end (46% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.056% fail on Locking devices (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Pipes and hoses (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Other components
      • 0.028% fail on Operation
    • 0.14% fail on Steering gear (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Steering rack (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.019% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.0094% fail on Steering column
    • 0.0094% fail on Steering play
      • 0.0094% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (72% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Exhaust system (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Transmission (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts (93% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Joints (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.0094% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.0094% fail on Joints
    • 0.075% fail on Fuel system (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Pipe
      • 0.0094% fail on System
    • 0.075% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.047% fail on Body
      • 0.037% fail on Other body component
      • 0.0094% fail on Panel
    • 0.019% fail on Doors (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.019% fail on Door condition
  • 0.66% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Exhaust emissions (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Compression ignition (75% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.075% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.037% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.019% fail on Other emission control equipment
          • 0.0094% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.0094% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
        • 0.0094% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.0094% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.0094% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.26% fail on Spark ignition (87% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (82% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Catalyst emissions (89% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0094% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.075% fail on Fluid leaks (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Engine oil leaks (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.0094% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Attachment
    • 0.0094% fail on Condition
  • 0.28% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Seat belts (55% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Condition (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.084% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (82% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.22% fail on Identification of the vehicle (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Registration plates (49% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.0094% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.0094% fail on Doors
      • 0.0094% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
Read the Honest John Review

  • Honda CR-V (2007 - 2012)
    Roomy and versatile. Very comfortable, pleasant and relaxing to drive. not at all cumbersome. 2.2 i-CTDI diesel is excellent.

    Search Good Garages