Honda CR-V MOT Results

Registered in 2009
80.3% pass rate
from 9,281 tests in 2017
(40% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda CR-V is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.2% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (54% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (54% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps (38% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (49% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Headlamp levelling device (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.032% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.086% fail on Headlamp levelling device (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.065% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (63% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Position lamps (60% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.68% fail on Front lamps (77% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.74% fail on Stop lamp (77% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Direction indicators (53% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Flashing type (53% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.086% fail on Individual lamps (90% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.32% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.086% fail on Battery
    • 0.054% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.032% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.032% fail on Horn (85% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 4.7% fail on Suspension (56% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (45% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage condition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.043% fail on Attachment
      • 0.032% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers (48% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Condition (48% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Suspension arms (77% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (77% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Front suspension joints (49% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Coil springs (96% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Condition (97% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Location
    • 0.054% fail on Drive shafts (95% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Front drive shafts (95% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.054% fail on Constant velocity joints (95% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.032% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.032% fail on Macpherson strut (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Condition (82% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Wheel bearings (93% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Front (91% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Rear
    • 0.011% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.011% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.011% fail on Gas suspension
      • 0.011% fail on Suspension unit
  • 4.6% fail on Brakes (29% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Hub components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.18% fail on Brake discs (70% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.011% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.011% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.96% fail on Brake performance (67% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Parking brake performance (41% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Rear wheels (75% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Front wheels (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Gradient hand brake (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.032% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.022% fail on Parking brake operation (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.011% fail on Brake operation
    • 0.60% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.60% fail on Condition (49% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Service brake control components (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Anti-slip (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic systems (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Components (87% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.065% fail on Hoses
        • 0.022% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.032% fail on Leaks
      • 0.022% fail on Operation
    • 0.032% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.022% fail on Cable
      • 0.011% fail on Lever
    • 0.032% fail on Restricted movement (78% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.022% fail on ABS (92% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres (44% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth (28% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (63% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.032% fail on Size/type (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 3.3% fail on Driver's view of the road (37% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Wipers (20% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Washers (51% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Windscreen (49% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Mirrors (80% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.73% fail on Steering (39% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Steering system (54% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Track rod end (53% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.011% fail on Free play
        • 0.011% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.22% fail on Power steering (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pipes and hoses (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Operation
      • 0.022% fail on Other components
    • 0.022% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.022% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.53% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.53% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.32% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (48% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.20% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Seat belts (58% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels (56% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment
  • 0.12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (94% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.065% fail on Fuel system (67% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Cap
      • 0.022% fail on Tank
      • 0.011% fail on System
    • 0.054% fail on Exhaust system (96% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.065% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (85% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Body condition
    • 0.022% fail on Doors (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.011% fail on Passengers other
  • 0.022% fail on Towbars (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Towbar (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Honda CR-V (2007 - 2012)
    Roomy and versatile. Very comfortable, pleasant and relaxing to drive. not at all cumbersome. 2.2 i-CTDI diesel is excellent.

    Search Good Garages