Honda CR-V MOT Results
Registered in 200869.0% pass rate
from 12,073 tests in 2021
(25% better than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda CR-V is unusually good or bad.
-
11% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(20% better than other 2008 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp
- 0.31% fail on Headlamp levelling device (65% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Stop lamp (17% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.75% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.099% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
(48% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (53% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (44% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.77% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.77% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.77% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.27% fail on
Electrical equipment
(47% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.058% fail on Trailer electrical socket (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.0083% fail on Horn
- 0.075% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.058% fail on
Position lamps
(65% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Position lamp (63% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.0083% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.0083% fail on Reversing lamps
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamps
-
11% fail on
Suspension
(31% better than other 2008 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(50% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (75% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (26% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Ball joint (87% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.68% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Linkage (59% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.075% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.066% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(48% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint (47% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (50% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Pins and bushes (78% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Suspension arm (88% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
1.6% fail on
Springs
(72% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Coil springs
(72% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Coil spring (73% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Mounting (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0083% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
1.6% fail on
Coil springs
(72% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.36% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (48% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0083% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.12% fail on
Sub-frames
(74% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Sub-frame (57% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (77% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.099% fail on
Macpherson strut
(54% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.0083% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.066% fail on Wheel bearings (93% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.050% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.025% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.017% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.017% fail on Ball joint
-
6.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(50% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Brakes
(47% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(24% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.0% fail on Brake pads
- 0.050% fail on Brake linings
-
0.59% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(52% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Brake discs (51% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.0083% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.0083% fail on Cable
-
2.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.0% fail on
Brake performance
(62% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(49% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Rbt (sp) (69% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0083% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
0.52% fail on
Parking brake performance
(52% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Rbt
(58% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance (57% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (73% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.066% fail on
Decelerometer
(4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Parking brake performance (11 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.025% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.017% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.0083% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.44% fail on
Rbt
(58% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Service brake performance
(83% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Rbt
(84% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Service brake performance (83% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Service brake imbalance (92% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.050% fail on
Decelerometer
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Rbt
(84% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.075% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(89% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(94% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Service brake performance (86% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Service brake imbalance (97% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(94% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(49% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(93% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Hand lever
-
0.42% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.42% fail on Lever
-
0.31% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(66% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Anti-lock braking system (62% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Electronic stability control (66% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.058% fail on Flexible brake hoses (66% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(75% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Brake fluid (74% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0083% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.025% fail on Rigid brake pipes (98% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(91% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0083% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.0083% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
2.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(24% better than other 2008 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Tyres
(30% better than other 2008 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Tread depth (13% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Condition (50% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Size/type (63% better than other 2008 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Visibility
(32% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Wipers (17% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Washers (40% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.066% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.066% fail on Windscreen
-
0.058% fail on
View to rear
(67% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Mirrors (66% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0083% fail on Driver's view
- 0.0083% fail on Bonnet
-
3.8% fail on
Steering
(41% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(42% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Track rod end (45% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Ball joint
- 0.066% fail on Locking devices
- 0.041% fail on Drag link end
- 0.0083% fail on Steering arm
-
0.62% fail on
Power steering
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Pipes and hoses (10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Other components (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Operation
- 0.0083% fail on Pump
- 0.0083% fail on Rams
-
0.34% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.33% fail on Steering rack
- 0.0083% fail on Operation
-
0.11% fail on
Steering play
- 0.11% fail on Steering rack
- 0.017% fail on Electronic power steering
- 0.0083% fail on Steering column
-
2.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(42% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(70% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Exhaust system (67% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Transmission
(79% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Drive shafts
(81% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Joints (82% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.083% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.033% fail on Prop shaft
- 0.025% fail on Flexible couplings (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Bearing housing
- 0.0083% fail on Joints
-
0.49% fail on
Drive shafts
(81% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.14% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.050% fail on Pipe
- 0.017% fail on Tank
- 0.017% fail on System
- 0.0083% fail on Hose
- 0.058% fail on Undertray
-
0.050% fail on
Body
(63% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Other body component
- 0.0083% fail on Panel
-
0.041% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(84% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (85% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.0083% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.0083% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
0.041% fail on
Chassis
(65% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.041% fail on
Towbar
(6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Other towbar components (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0083% fail on Coupling
- 0.033% fail on Bumpers (79% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Doors
(91% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Other passenger's door
(85% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Door condition (85% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.0083% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.0083% fail on Door condition
-
0.025% fail on
Other passenger's door
(85% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.0083% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.0083% fail on Bracket
-
0.0083% fail on
Load security
-
0.0083% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.0083% fail on Tailgate condition
-
0.0083% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.0083% fail on Floor
-
0.0083% fail on
Seats
- 0.0083% fail on Driver's seat
-
1.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(73% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(74% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Compression ignition
(50% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.18% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (60% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (68% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Emissions not tested (58% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.017% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.0083% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.55% fail on
Spark ignition
(85% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Catalyst emissions (87% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (87% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested (79% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.017% fail on Catalytic converter
-
0.80% fail on
Compression ignition
(50% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Fluid leaks
(64% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Engine oil leaks (81% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Other leaks
- 0.025% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.017% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
0.025% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.025% fail on Undertray
-
1.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(74% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(33% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.77% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.27% fail on
Seat belts
(65% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Prescribed areas (81% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0083% fail on Attachment
- 0.0083% fail on Pre-tensioners
-
0.0083% fail on
Airbags
- 0.0083% fail on Passengers airbag
-
0.44% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.44% fail on Attachment
-
0.31% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(41% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Registration plates (41% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.0083% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.0083% fail on
Steps and stairs
- 0.0083% fail on Steps
-
0.0083% fail on
Steps and stairs
Read the Honest John Review
-
Honda CR-V (2007 - 2012)
Roomy and versatile. Very comfortable, pleasant and relaxing to drive. not at all cumbersome. 2.2 i-CTDI diesel is excellent.