Honda CR-V MOT Results
Registered in 200354.3% pass rate
from 9,908 tests in 2017
(5.9% better than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda CR-V is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(5.5% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (31% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.0% fail on
Position lamps
(26% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 8.2% fail on Front lamps (50% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Rear lamps (57% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.12% fail on All position lamps
- 7.6% fail on Stop lamp (31% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Headlamp aim (13% better than other 2003 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Headlamps
(22% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Headlamp (22% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.17% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.10% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Battery (32% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(65% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Fog lamp (64% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Tell tale
-
0.38% fail on
Direction indicators
(86% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Flashing type
(86% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Individual lamps (88% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Side repeaters (80% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Tell tales
- 0.010% fail on Switch
-
0.38% fail on
Flashing type
(86% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.10% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.091% fail on Horn (86% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.081% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.030% fail on
Hazard warning
(85% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Lamp
-
20% fail on
Suspension
-
10% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(78% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (51% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Linkage condition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (65% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Attachment (91% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Condition (200% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Presence
-
5.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(13% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (17% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.081% fail on Attachment
- 0.030% fail on Condition (84% better than other 2003 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Coil springs
(16% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Condition (14% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Location
- 2.9% fail on Front suspension joints (90% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(71% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
(73% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Constant velocity joints (72% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.071% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.061% fail on Drive shafts
- 0.010% fail on Universal joint
-
1.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
(73% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
(22% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (22% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
(50% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Component mounting (47% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Subframe mounting (53% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Spring mounting (82% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(50% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.071% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (67% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Condition
- 0.010% fail on Attachment
-
0.10% fail on
Wheel bearings
(94% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.071% fail on Front (90% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Rear (97% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.040% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.040% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.040% fail on
Sub-frames
(85% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.010% fail on Attachment
-
0.030% fail on
Macpherson strut
(94% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Condition (94% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.020% fail on Condition
-
0.010% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.010% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.010% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.010% fail on Attachment
-
0.010% fail on
Axles
- 0.010% fail on Stub axle
-
10% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(78% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
(21% better than other 2003 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Hub components
(71% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Brake pads (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Brake discs (29% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Brake calipers (97% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.071% fail on Brake back plates (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Brake linings
-
4.4% fail on
Brake performance
(47% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Rear wheels (58% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (64% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Front wheels (57% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Brake performance not tested (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Service brake performance (51% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Brake operation (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Brake imbalance (93% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Parking brake operation (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(34% better than other 2003 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Components
(45% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Pipes (30% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Hoses (93% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.071% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.010% fail on Servos
- 0.010% fail on Pump
- 0.010% fail on Valves
- 0.76% fail on Operation (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Leaks
- 0.040% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
3.2% fail on
Components
(45% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Service brake control components
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Pedal
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Anti-slip (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Pedal
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Restricted movement (92% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Parking brake
(56% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Condition (56% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.22% fail on ABS (79% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.020% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
- 0.010% fail on Additional braking devices
-
0.010% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.010% fail on Cable
-
0.010% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.010% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
5.5% fail on
Hub components
(71% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.1% fail on Wipers
- 3.9% fail on Washers
- 0.58% fail on Windscreen
- 0.23% fail on Mirrors
- 0.020% fail on Bonnet (87% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
6.2% fail on
Tyres
(32% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Tread depth (38% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Condition (26% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Valve stem
- 0.12% fail on Size/type (64% better than other 2003 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Steering
(35% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Steering system
(49% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Track rod end (36% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint
- 0.030% fail on Steering rack (96% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Steering box
- 0.010% fail on Drag link end
-
0.010% fail on
Other components
- 0.010% fail on Steering pivot point
-
1.00% fail on
Power steering
(120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Operation
- 0.050% fail on Other components
- 0.010% fail on Drive system
- 0.010% fail on Pump
- 0.061% fail on Locking devices
-
2.3% fail on
Steering system
(49% better than other 2003 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(58% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Exhaust system (50% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Emissions (57% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested (57% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Fuel system
(97% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Tank
- 0.010% fail on Pipe
-
1.7% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(48% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.91% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(40% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.88% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (38% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.83% fail on
Seat belts
(55% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Prescribed areas (67% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Condition
- 0.040% fail on Requirements
- 0.010% fail on Attachment
-
0.010% fail on
Installation check
- 0.010% fail on Anchorage's
-
0.91% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(40% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(73% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Body condition (75% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Seats
- 0.11% fail on Passengers
- 0.061% fail on Drivers
-
0.14% fail on
Vehicle structure
(63% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Chassis (63% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.061% fail on
Doors
(90% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Passengers other (85% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Drivers
- 0.010% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.010% fail on Body security
-
0.45% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(59% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Registration plate (59% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.33% fail on Attachment
-
0.050% fail on
Towbars
- 0.030% fail on Towbar
- 0.020% fail on Vehicle structure
Read the Honest John Review
-
Honda CR-V (2002 - 2006)
Low-down pull from refined chain cam engines. Walk-through cabin on CVT auto models. Large boot can be increased by sliding the rear seats forward. Lasting very well.