Honda CR-V MOT Results
Registered in 200255.5% pass rate
from 7,849 tests in 2017
(10% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda CR-V is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
9.0% fail on
Position lamps
(23% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 8.4% fail on Front lamps (51% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Rear lamps (65% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.064% fail on All position lamps
- 7.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (11% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Stop lamp (11% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim (18% better than other 2002 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.0% fail on Headlamp
-
0.15% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
0.089% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.089% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.013% fail on Matched pair
- 0.76% fail on Battery
-
0.48% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(68% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Fog lamp (68% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Switch
-
0.33% fail on
Direction indicators
(88% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Flashing type
(88% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Side repeaters (72% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Individual lamps (95% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.013% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.013% fail on Tell tales
-
0.33% fail on
Flashing type
(88% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Horn (77% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Rear reflectors (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.089% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.051% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.013% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.013% fail on Lamp
-
9.0% fail on
Position lamps
(23% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
18% fail on
Suspension
(19% better than other 2002 cars)
-
8.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(54% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (30% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Linkage condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (44% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Attachment (83% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(17% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (15% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Attachment
- 0.051% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2002 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.8% fail on Condition
- 1.7% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(71% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
(75% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (75% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Couplings
- 0.013% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.17% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Drive shafts
- 0.013% fail on Universal joint
-
1.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
(75% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
0.93% fail on
Prescribed areas
(71% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Component mounting (65% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Subframe mounting (94% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.051% fail on Condition
- 0.038% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.076% fail on
Wheel bearings
(96% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Front (92% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Rear
-
0.064% fail on
Trailing arms
(80% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (77% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.064% fail on
Sub-frames
(81% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.051% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
0.013% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.013% fail on Condition
-
0.013% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.013% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.013% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.013% fail on Condition
-
8.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(54% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brakes
(19% better than other 2002 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Hub components
(85% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Brake discs
- 0.27% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.10% fail on Brake back plates (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Brake linings
-
4.7% fail on
Brake performance
(47% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Rear wheels (52% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (60% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Front wheels (70% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Brake performance not tested (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Brake operation (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Service brake performance (72% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Brake imbalance (92% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Gradient hand brake (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Parking brake operation
-
4.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(35% better than other 2002 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Components
(48% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Pipes (34% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Hoses (85% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.013% fail on Cylinders
- 0.013% fail on Pump
- 0.83% fail on Operation (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Leaks
- 0.089% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
3.1% fail on
Components
(48% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake control components
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Pedal
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Anti-slip (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Pedal
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Restricted movement (57% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Parking brake
(59% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Condition (59% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.23% fail on ABS (79% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Additional braking devices
-
0.013% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.013% fail on Operation
-
0.013% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.013% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
6.0% fail on
Hub components
(85% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.0% fail on Wipers
- 4.5% fail on Washers (22% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Windscreen
- 0.22% fail on Mirrors (49% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Bonnet
-
5.8% fail on
Tyres
(36% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Tread depth (41% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Condition (32% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Size/type (62% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Valve stem
-
3.7% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(53% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Exhaust system (45% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Emissions (47% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Emissions not tested (58% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Fuel system
(97% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Cap (92% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Steering
(46% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Steering system
(56% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Track rod end (42% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint
- 0.051% fail on Steering rack (95% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Power steering
- 0.61% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Operation
- 0.038% fail on Other components (77% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Locking devices
- 0.013% fail on Steering operation
- 0.013% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.9% fail on
Steering system
(56% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(44% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(30% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (26% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.013% fail on Passengers airbag
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
(55% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Condition (47% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas (86% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Attachment
- 0.013% fail on Requirements
-
0.013% fail on
Installation check
- 0.013% fail on Anchorage's
-
1.2% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(30% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.87% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(70% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Seats
- 0.25% fail on Drivers
- 0.15% fail on Passengers
- 0.27% fail on Body condition (77% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.089% fail on
Doors
(88% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Drivers (76% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Passengers other (91% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Passengers front
-
0.064% fail on
Vehicle structure
(89% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Chassis (89% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.025% fail on Speedometer
- 0.013% fail on Body security
- 0.013% fail on Spare wheel
-
0.41% fail on
Seats
-
0.48% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(58% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Registration plate (58% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.37% fail on Attachment
- 0.013% fail on Condition
-
0.038% fail on
Towbars
- 0.038% fail on Towbar
- 0.013% fail on Vehicle structure
Read the Honest John Review
-
Honda CR-V (2002 - 2006)
Low-down pull from refined chain cam engines. Walk-through cabin on CVT auto models. Large boot can be increased by sliding the rear seats forward. Lasting very well.