Honda CR-V MOT Results

Registered in 2000
51.2% pass rate
from 3,599 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda CR-V is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (86% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Position lamps (24% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Front lamps (57% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Rear lamps (75% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on All position lamps
    • 8.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (38% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim (36% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps (49% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp (49% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.083% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.1% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.17% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.083% fail on Switch
    • 0.94% fail on Horn (73% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Battery
    • 0.25% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Direction indicators (92% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Flashing type (92% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Side repeaters (87% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on All direction indicators (81% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on Individual lamps (97% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.083% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.056% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 26% fail on Suspension (20% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (96% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (89% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage condition (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 7.5% fail on Suspension arms (77% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (79% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment
    • 4.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.4% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.25% fail on Subframe mounting (74% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Spring mounting (77% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Front suspension joints (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Coil springs (37% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Condition (41% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Location
    • 2.7% fail on Trailing arms (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts (56% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Front drive shafts (57% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (58% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on Couplings
        • 0.028% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.083% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.083% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.47% fail on Shock absorbers (71% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Condition (71% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Radius arms (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (200% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.056% fail on Attachment
    • 0.17% fail on Sub-frames (66% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.17% fail on Wheel bearings (91% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Front (81% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Rear
    • 0.083% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.056% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.056% fail on Condition
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.1% fail on Emissions
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.50% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.50% fail on Cap
  • 9.0% fail on Brakes (48% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Hydraulic systems (20% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Components (25% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Pipes
        • 0.25% fail on Hoses (83% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.083% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.028% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.39% fail on Leaks
      • 0.36% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Hub components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.39% fail on Brake discs (55% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Brake back plates
    • 1.7% fail on Brake performance (82% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Front wheels (84% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Service brake performance (69% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.19% fail on Brake operation (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Rear wheels (99% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Parking brake operation
    • 0.42% fail on ABS (70% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.33% fail on Pedal
        • 0.22% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Parking brake (79% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.083% fail on Restricted movement (73% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.028% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.028% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.028% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 8.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers (25% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.33% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth (21% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.056% fail on Size/type (84% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 3.9% fail on Steering
    • 3.4% fail on Steering system
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end (33% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.056% fail on Free play
        • 0.056% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.39% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
      • 0.14% fail on Other components
      • 0.056% fail on Rams
      • 0.028% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.25% fail on Locking devices (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.028% fail on Steering control
      • 0.028% fail on Steering column
  • 2.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (33% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Body condition (40% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Doors
      • 0.50% fail on Drivers (200% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.22% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.42% fail on Vehicle structure (56% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Chassis (56% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Load security (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Access panel (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Bootlid
    • 0.056% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.028% fail on Body security
    • 0.028% fail on Seats
      • 0.028% fail on Passengers
  • 2.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (59% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts (58% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Prescribed areas (65% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
      • 0.056% fail on Requirements
    • 0.58% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (66% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (63% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.64% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.61% fail on Attachment (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.028% fail on Condition
  • 0.083% fail on Towbars
    • 0.056% fail on Towbar
    • 0.028% fail on Vehicle structure
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages