Honda CR-V MOT Results

Registered in 1999
49.0% pass rate
from 2,854 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda CR-V is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Suspension (34% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (85% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (85% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage condition (82% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Condition
      • 0.035% fail on Presence
    • 7.2% fail on Suspension arms (74% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (84% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 7.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 6.6% fail on Component mounting (37% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Subframe mounting (48% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Spring mounting
    • 5.5% fail on Coil springs (97% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Location
    • 4.7% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.0% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (24% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Drive shafts (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.035% fail on Couplings
      • 0.32% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Trailing arms (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Shock absorbers (42% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Condition (42% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Radius arms (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
      • 0.070% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.035% fail on Attachment
    • 0.21% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.070% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Wheel bearings (91% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Front (76% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Rear
    • 0.070% fail on Macpherson strut (82% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Condition (82% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.035% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.035% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.035% fail on Axles
      • 0.035% fail on Axle beam
  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.8% fail on Stop lamp (57% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (32% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.7% fail on Front lamps (41% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Rear lamps (71% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim (34% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps (36% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp (35% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.070% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.7% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.60% fail on Battery (47% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Horn
    • 0.35% fail on Direction indicators (88% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Flashing type (88% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Side repeaters (73% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Individual lamps (94% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.035% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.28% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.070% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (25% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 9.6% fail on Emissions (42% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested (52% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.74% fail on Cap (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on System
  • 10% fail on Brakes (42% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Hydraulic systems (22% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Components (23% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Pipes
        • 0.25% fail on Hoses (86% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Operation (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.21% fail on Leaks
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.25% fail on Brake discs (68% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Brake linings
    • 1.6% fail on ABS
    • 1.5% fail on Brake performance (85% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Front wheels (84% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Parking brake performance (91% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Rear wheels (93% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance (79% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.11% fail on Brake imbalance (84% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Gradient hand brake
      • 0.035% fail on Brake operation
    • 0.42% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.42% fail on Pedal
        • 0.28% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Parking brake (79% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Condition (79% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Restricted movement
  • 8.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.46% fail on Bonnet (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.25% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.1% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Valve stem (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Size/type (79% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 4.2% fail on Steering
    • 3.6% fail on Steering system
      • 2.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.2% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Free play
        • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.035% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.39% fail on Power steering
      • 0.18% fail on Other components
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
      • 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.28% fail on Locking devices (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Steering control
      • 0.035% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.035% fail on Steering column
    • 0.035% fail on Rear wheel steering
      • 0.035% fail on Operation
  • 3.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (25% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Body condition
    • 0.98% fail on Doors
      • 0.35% fail on Drivers
      • 0.35% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.32% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.56% fail on Vehicle structure (52% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Chassis (52% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.035% fail on Body security
    • 0.035% fail on Load security
      • 0.035% fail on Access panel
  • 2.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (46% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts (46% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas (46% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
      • 0.070% fail on Requirements
    • 0.88% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (49% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (45% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.39% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.35% fail on Attachment
    • 0.035% fail on Condition
  • 0.18% fail on Towbars
    • 0.11% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.070% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages