Honda CR-V MOT Results

Registered in 1997
45.0% pass rate
from 776 tests in 2017
(21% worse than other 1997 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda CR-V is unusually good or bad.

  • 33% fail on Suspension (72% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 12% fail on Prescribed areas (84% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 12% fail on Component mounting (130% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage condition (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 9.3% fail on Suspension arms (180% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (190% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 7.3% fail on Drive shafts (95% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Front drive shafts (96% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 7.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (94% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Couplings
      • 0.26% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.26% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.3% fail on Coil springs (150% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Condition (160% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Location
    • 3.9% fail on Front suspension joints (200% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Trailing arms (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Radius arms (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 0.64% fail on Shock absorbers (67% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Condition (67% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.26% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.26% fail on Wheel bearings (86% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Front
  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (18% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Stop lamp (99% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (56% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.1% fail on Front lamps (68% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.26% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (39% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.7% fail on Fog lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.0% fail on Battery
    • 0.52% fail on Horn
    • 0.26% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.26% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.13% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.13% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.13% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.13% fail on Switch
    • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 5.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.2% fail on Components
        • 4.5% fail on Pipes
        • 0.52% fail on Hoses (73% better than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.52% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.39% fail on Leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
    • 5.9% fail on ABS (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Hub components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.52% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.13% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.13% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.1% fail on Brake performance (77% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Front wheels (72% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Parking brake performance (87% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.26% fail on Rear wheels (93% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Service brake performance (85% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.13% fail on Parking brake operation
    • 0.77% fail on Service brake control components (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Anti-slip (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Restricted movement
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (34% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Emissions (41% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.26% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.26% fail on Cap
  • 8.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.64% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.39% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.39% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.7% fail on Steering (75% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Steering system (93% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Track rod end (140% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Steering rack (160% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.26% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.13% fail on Free play
        • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.52% fail on Locking devices (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Power steering
      • 0.26% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
    • 0.13% fail on Steering operation
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Size/type
  • 6.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.5% fail on Body condition
    • 1.5% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.5% fail on Chassis
    • 1.4% fail on Doors
      • 0.64% fail on Drivers
      • 0.52% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.26% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.13% fail on Body security
  • 4.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Requirements
    • 1.0% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.0% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.8% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.39% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.39% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages