Honda CR-V MOT Results

Registered in 1996
44.7% pass rate
from 159 tests in 2017
(25% worse than other 1996 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda CR-V is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Suspension (81% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 13% fail on Prescribed areas (86% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 11% fail on Component mounting (97% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 12% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 11% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.63% fail on Drive shafts
    • 6.9% fail on Suspension arms (130% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (150% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Attachment
    • 6.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.63% fail on Condition
      • 0.63% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.5% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.63% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.63% fail on Condition
    • 0.63% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.63% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 15% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 15% fail on Fog lamp (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Tell tale
    • 6.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.63% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.63% fail on Battery
    • 0.63% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.63% fail on Lamp
  • 15% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 8.2% fail on Emissions
    • 3.1% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.63% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.63% fail on Cap
  • 11% fail on Steering (130% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 11% fail on Steering system (170% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.63% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.63% fail on Steering arm
  • 9.4% fail on Brakes
    • 4.4% fail on ABS (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Hub components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.9% fail on Brake performance (78% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.63% fail on Service brake performance
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.63% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.63% fail on Pedal
        • 0.63% fail on Anti-slip
  • 8.2% fail on Tyres
    • 5.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
  • 8.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 7.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 7.5% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.63% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.63% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 8.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.63% fail on Bonnet
  • 2.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.3% fail on Body condition
    • 0.63% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.63% fail on Chassis
    • 0.63% fail on Body security
  • 1.9% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.63% fail on Towbars
    • 0.63% fail on Vehicle structure

Search Good Garages