Honda Civic MOT Results
Registered in 201686.7% pass rate
from 16,377 tests in 2021
(20% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda Civic is unusually good or bad.
-
4.0% fail on
Visibility
- 3.1% fail on Wipers
- 0.93% fail on Washers
-
0.055% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.055% fail on Windscreen
-
0.024% fail on
View to rear
- 0.024% fail on Mirrors
- 0.012% fail on Driver's view
-
3.7% fail on
Tyres
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 1.6% fail on Tread depth (15% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Size/type
-
2.8% fail on
Brakes
-
2.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(20% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(40% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Brake pads (40% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Brake linings
-
0.13% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(72% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Brake discs (72% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0061% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.0061% fail on Linkage
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(40% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Brake performance
(51% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Service brake performance
(34% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Rbt
(36% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Service brake performance (41% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.012% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.012% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.26% fail on
Rbt
(36% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.043% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.037% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.024% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.012% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.0061% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.037% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.024% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(89% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Rbt (sp) (89% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Parking brake performance
(87% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Rbt
(87% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Parking brake performance (85% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Rbt
(87% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Service brake performance
(34% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(110% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.031% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.018% fail on Hand lever
- 0.012% fail on Pedal
-
0.018% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.018% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.012% fail on
Parking brake control
(89% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Lever (87% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0061% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.0061% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.0061% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.0061% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
2.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(20% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(27% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim (20% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamps
(51% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp (70% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.17% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.17% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.17% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.16% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (53% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.043% fail on
Direction indicators
(88% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.043% fail on
Flashing type
(88% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Side repeaters (87% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0061% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.043% fail on
Flashing type
(88% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Stop lamp (95% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.024% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.024% fail on Battery(ies)
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
0.50% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(40% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(40% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Spark ignition
(43% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (38% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Catalyst emissions (50% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0061% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0061% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.0061% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.22% fail on
Compression ignition
(35% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.012% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.0061% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.0061% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.27% fail on
Spark ignition
(43% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.0061% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.0061% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
0.49% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(40% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Suspension
(90% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.073% fail on
Suspension arms
(85% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Pins and bushes (85% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0061% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.0061% fail on Ball joint
-
0.073% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(64% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.012% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.012% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.049% fail on Shock absorbers (65% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Springs
(98% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Coil springs
(98% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Coil spring (98% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Coil springs
(98% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0061% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.0061% fail on Ball joint
-
0.073% fail on
Suspension arms
(85% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.11% fail on Condition
- 0.0061% fail on Requirements
- 0.067% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.0061% fail on
Airbags
- 0.0061% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(75% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Bumpers
- 0.024% fail on Exhaust system (85% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.024% fail on
Transmission
(89% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.024% fail on
Drive shafts
(88% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Joints (88% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.024% fail on
Drive shafts
(88% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.024% fail on
Body
- 0.018% fail on Other body component
- 0.0061% fail on Panel
-
0.018% fail on
Seats
- 0.012% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.0061% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.0061% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.0061% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.0061% fail on Undertray
-
0.13% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
-
0.073% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(66% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Registration plates (66% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.067% fail on
Steering
(75% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.043% fail on
Steering linkage components
(80% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Locking devices
- 0.0061% fail on Ball joint
-
0.012% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.012% fail on Steering rack
- 0.012% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.043% fail on
Steering linkage components
(80% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0061% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.0061% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review