MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Honda » Civic » 2010

Honda Civic MOT Results

Registered in 2010
60.8% pass rate
from 18,352 tests in 2021
(3.6% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda Civic is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Stop lamp (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Direction indicators (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Flashing type (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Side repeaters (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Individual direction indicators (54% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on All direction indicators (57% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps (32% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp (37% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Headlamp levelling device (58% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.0054% fail on Matched pair
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.47% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.21% fail on Battery(ies) (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.027% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.011% fail on Horn (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Rear fog lamp (70% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Rear fog lamp (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.11% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.0054% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.076% fail on Reversing lamps (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Reversing lamps (71% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.022% fail on Switch
    • 0.022% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.022% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.0054% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.011% fail on Rear reflectors (83% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 12% fail on Suspension (13% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (72% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Ball joint dust cover (97% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Ball joint (96% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.027% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.022% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0054% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.5% fail on Springs (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Coil springs (36% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Coil spring (36% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0054% fail on Mounting
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Suspension arms (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Suspension arm (92% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Wheel bearings (39% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Axles
      • 0.10% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
      • 0.0054% fail on Axle
      • 0.0054% fail on Stub axle
    • 0.082% fail on Other suspension component (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.022% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.060% fail on Sub-frames (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.016% fail on Sub-frame (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.054% fail on Macpherson strut (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.016% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.016% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.049% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.038% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.016% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.011% fail on Suspension unit
      • 0.0054% fail on Other components
  • 6.2% fail on Brakes (22% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.033% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.0054% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.049% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.038% fail on Lever
        • 0.011% fail on Cable (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Brake performance (41% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (40% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (39% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.92% fail on Service brake performance (46% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.0054% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0054% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (41% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (38% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (31% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Rbt (sp) (30% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake imbalance (35% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.36% fail on Parking brake performance (55% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Rbt (54% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance (53% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.022% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (68% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.011% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.011% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0054% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0054% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0054% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0054% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.065% fail on Brake performance not tested (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.46% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.098% fail on Electronic stability control (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.17% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Hand lever (47% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Pedal (55% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake control (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Lever (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.044% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.038% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.0054% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.033% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.033% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Rigid brake pipes (99% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0054% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres (7.8% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition (20% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Size/type (67% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 4.8% fail on Visibility (11% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 2.1% fail on Wipers (17% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear
      • 0.15% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.0054% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.11% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.11% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.022% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.011% fail on Bonnet (92% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 2.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.21% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.11% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.071% fail on Pipe (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Hose
      • 0.0054% fail on Tank
      • 0.0054% fail on System
    • 0.13% fail on Transmission (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts (91% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Joints (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Body
      • 0.098% fail on Other body component
      • 0.022% fail on Panel
    • 0.082% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.065% fail on Doors (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.033% fail on Door condition
      • 0.016% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.016% fail on Door condition
      • 0.016% fail on Other passenger's door (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Door condition (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Undertray
    • 0.038% fail on Seats
      • 0.033% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.011% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.022% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.016% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.0054% fail on Bracket
    • 0.011% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.011% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.0054% fail on Chassis
      • 0.0054% fail on Chassis condition
  • 2.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (35% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.016% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.011% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.32% fail on Compression ignition (75% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Emissions not tested (67% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.033% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.022% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (95% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.011% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.011% fail on Catalytic converter
    • 0.10% fail on Fluid leaks (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Engine oil leaks (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.060% fail on Noise suppression (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Undertray (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 1.0% fail on Steering (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Steering linkage components (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Track rod end (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.044% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.027% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.011% fail on Lock stop (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Steering gear (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Steering rack (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Operation
    • 0.016% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.0054% fail on Steering play
      • 0.0054% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0054% fail on Steering lock
  • 0.40% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.37% fail on Attachment
    • 0.038% fail on Condition (67% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.37% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (59% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Seat belts (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Condition (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0054% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0054% fail on Requirements
    • 0.0054% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0054% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.37% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.37% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.0054% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.0054% fail on Doors
      • 0.0054% fail on Emergency exits
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages