Honda Civic MOT Results

Registered in 1995
57.0% pass rate
from 1,218 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda Civic is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp (59% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.57% fail on Rear lamps (67% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.5% fail on Horn
    • 1.3% fail on Battery
    • 0.82% fail on Direction indicators (72% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Flashing type (72% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Individual lamps (77% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.74% fail on Rear fog lamp (76% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Fog lamp (77% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Tell tale
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 7.6% fail on Drive shafts (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Front drive shafts (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 7.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.16% fail on Drive shafts
    • 6.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.7% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.33% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.25% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.9% fail on Trailing arms (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Attachment (10 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment
      • 0.082% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.74% fail on Shock absorbers (63% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Condition (63% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Anti-roll bars (80% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (91% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment
    • 0.57% fail on Wheel bearings (67% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Rear
      • 0.25% fail on Front
    • 0.25% fail on Bonded suspension (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Coil springs (85% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Location
    • 0.16% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.082% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.082% fail on Attachment
  • 10% fail on Brakes (30% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Brake performance (26% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (53% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Rear wheels (59% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.082% fail on Brake operation
    • 3.3% fail on Hydraulic systems (43% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Components (44% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Pipes (39% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Hoses
      • 0.41% fail on Leaks
      • 0.25% fail on Operation
      • 0.082% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.25% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.16% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.082% fail on Brake back plates
    • 0.74% fail on ABS
    • 0.33% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.082% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.082% fail on Pedal
        • 0.082% fail on Anti-slip
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.4% fail on Emissions
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.74% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.33% fail on Cap
      • 0.25% fail on Tank
      • 0.16% fail on Pipe
  • 9.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.90% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.1% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth (47% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.082% fail on Size/type
    • 0.082% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.8% fail on Steering (41% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Steering system (59% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Free play
        • 0.16% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.41% fail on Locking devices (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Power steering
      • 0.25% fail on Operation
      • 0.082% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 3.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas (39% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment
      • 0.082% fail on Installation check
        • 0.082% fail on Anchorage's
    • 0.99% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.99% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 3.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (31% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Body condition
    • 0.57% fail on Vehicle structure (68% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Chassis (68% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Seats
      • 0.41% fail on Passengers
      • 0.082% fail on Drivers
    • 0.33% fail on Load security (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Tailgate (14 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Access panel
    • 0.25% fail on Doors
      • 0.16% fail on Drivers
      • 0.082% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.082% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.082% fail on Body security
  • 1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.082% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages