Honda Accord MOT Results
Registered in 199954.3% pass rate
from 893 tests in 2021
(14% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda Accord is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(22% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Headlamps
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.34% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.45% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.0% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.90% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.11% fail on Horn
- 0.90% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.56% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.56% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.56% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.56% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.22% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.22% fail on Position lamp
-
0.11% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.11% fail on Switch
-
7.7% fail on
Headlamps
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
16% fail on
Suspension
-
6.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(100% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Linkage (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Ball joint
- 0.56% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.34% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.11% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 5.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.45% fail on Pins and bushes (74% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Suspension arm
-
2.5% fail on
Sub-frames
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.67% fail on
Springs
(72% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Coil springs
(70% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Coil spring (70% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Coil springs
(70% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.45% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.34% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
-
6.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(100% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
16% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(92% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
16% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(100% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
15% fail on
Spark ignition
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 11% fail on Catalyst emissions (87% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Emissions not tested (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.22% fail on Oxygen sensor (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.90% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.34% fail on
Emission control equipment
(9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.11% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.11% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.11% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.34% fail on
Emission control equipment
(9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
15% fail on
Spark ignition
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.22% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.11% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
16% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(100% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
8.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt
- 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.56% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
- 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
- 0.78% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.45% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(82% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(82% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance (86% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(82% better than other 1999 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
3.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(90% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(94% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Brake pads (96% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.5% fail on Brake discs
-
0.22% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.11% fail on Cable
- 0.11% fail on Lever
-
2.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(94% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.5% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.11% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.11% fail on Other components
-
8.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.9% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Other passenger's door
(5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.11% fail on Door condition
-
1.8% fail on
Other passenger's door
(5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Chassis
- 1.6% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.5% fail on
Transmission
-
1.5% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.3% fail on Joints
- 0.11% fail on Flexible couplings
-
1.5% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.90% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.67% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.11% fail on Tank
- 0.11% fail on Pipe
-
0.22% fail on
Seats
- 0.22% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.22% fail on
Cabs
- 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.11% fail on Bumpers
-
9.1% fail on
Visibility
- 4.5% fail on Wipers
- 4.3% fail on Washers
- 0.45% fail on Bonnet
-
0.34% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.34% fail on Windscreen
- 0.11% fail on Driver's view
-
4.9% fail on
Steering
-
4.4% fail on
Steering gear
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Power steering
- 0.34% fail on Other components
- 0.22% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.11% fail on Operation
-
0.22% fail on
Steering linkage components
(90% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 1999 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Steering gear
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Condition
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth
- 0.11% fail on Size/type
-
3.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.4% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.45% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Attachment
- 1.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
2.4% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.1% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.1% fail on Registration plates
-
0.34% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.22% fail on Attachment
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
0.11% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
- 0.11% fail on Passenger grab handles