Honda Accord MOT Results
Registered in 199950.7% pass rate
from 2,635 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda Accord is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 9.4% fail on Headlamp aim (41% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Headlamps
(74% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Headlamp (76% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
-
0.076% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.076% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.038% fail on Matched pair
-
7.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.5% fail on Front lamps
- 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.038% fail on All position lamps
- 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (22% better than other 1999 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Stop lamp (21% better than other 1999 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Direction indicators
(38% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Flashing type
(38% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Individual lamps (50% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.68% fail on All direction indicators (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Flashing type
(38% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Battery
-
0.95% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.91% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.11% fail on Tell tale
- 0.27% fail on Horn
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.038% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
19% fail on
Suspension
(13% better than other 1999 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(69% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 2.3% fail on Linkage condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (87% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Attachment
-
5.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 2.9% fail on Subframe mounting (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Component mounting (47% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Spring mounting
-
3.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.038% fail on Attachment
- 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints
-
2.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(49% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
(49% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (50% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.038% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.038% fail on Drive shafts
-
2.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
(49% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Shock absorbers
(39% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Condition (39% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.65% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Attachment
-
0.42% fail on
Wheel bearings
(77% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Rear (73% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Front (80% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Coil springs
(93% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Condition (93% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.076% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.038% fail on Condition
- 0.038% fail on Attachment
-
0.038% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.038% fail on Condition
-
0.038% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.038% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.038% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.038% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
8.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(69% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
9.0% fail on
Brake performance
- 5.4% fail on Parking brake performance
- 4.8% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.4% fail on Front wheels (27% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Service brake performance (58% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.30% fail on Brake imbalance
-
6.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
5.5% fail on
Components
- 5.4% fail on Pipes (28% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Hoses (89% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.61% fail on Leaks
- 0.11% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.11% fail on Operation
-
5.5% fail on
Components
-
4.7% fail on
Hub components
(69% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Brake pads (97% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Brake discs
- 0.23% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.038% fail on Brake linings
- 1.6% fail on ABS
- 0.38% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.27% fail on
Parking brake
(74% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Condition (74% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.27% fail on
Pedal
- 0.15% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
0.27% fail on
Pedal
-
0.15% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.11% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
- 0.038% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
0.038% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.038% fail on Cable
-
9.0% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.6% fail on Emissions
- 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.3% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.57% fail on Cap
- 0.46% fail on Pipe (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.15% fail on System
- 0.038% fail on Tank
- 0.038% fail on Hose
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
8.7% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.3% fail on Wipers
- 3.5% fail on Washers
- 0.34% fail on Windscreen
- 0.27% fail on Mirrors
- 0.19% fail on Bonnet
-
8.6% fail on
Tyres
- 4.9% fail on Tread depth
- 4.1% fail on Condition
- 0.42% fail on Size/type
-
6.8% fail on
Steering
(49% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Steering system
(37% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Track rod end (68% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint
- 0.038% fail on Steering damper
-
1.6% fail on
Power steering
(180% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pipes and hoses (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Operation (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Other components
- 0.038% fail on Drive system
- 0.038% fail on Pump
- 0.038% fail on Rams
- 0.11% fail on Locking devices
- 0.038% fail on Steering operation
-
5.3% fail on
Steering system
(37% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(37% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Passengers other (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Passengers front
- 0.076% fail on Drivers
- 2.0% fail on Body condition
-
1.2% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.2% fail on Chassis
-
0.15% fail on
Seats
- 0.15% fail on Drivers
- 0.038% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.038% fail on Body security
-
0.038% fail on
Load security
- 0.038% fail on Access panel
-
2.6% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(50% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts
(53% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas (54% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Condition
- 0.038% fail on Requirements
-
1.1% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.076% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts
(53% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate
-
0.53% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.49% fail on Attachment
- 0.038% fail on Condition