MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Ford » Puma » 2002

Ford Puma MOT Results

Registered in 2002
53.5% pass rate
from 1,231 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Puma is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Suspension (51% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 15% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.1% fail on Pins and bushes (58% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint (43% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.081% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.4% fail on Sub-frames (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.081% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings (94% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Springs
      • 2.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.1% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.8% fail on Axles (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Axle
    • 1.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (69% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (63% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage ball joints (75% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.081% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.081% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.081% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.97% fail on Macpherson strut (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.41% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.73% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.24% fail on Other suspension component (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.081% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.081% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.081% fail on Suspension rod
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 5.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (53% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Brake performance (37% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (39% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (36% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.16% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.081% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.081% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (45% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (46% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (44% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.081% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.081% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.57% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (73% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Rbt (sp) (72% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake imbalance (61% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance (79% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Electronic stability control (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (50% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.32% fail on Brake linings and pads (86% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Brake pads (85% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.16% fail on Cable
    • 0.41% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.32% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Other braking system component (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.081% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.081% fail on Other components
    • 0.16% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.16% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.081% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.081% fail on Lever
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (40% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.32% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.41% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp (70% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Position lamps (56% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Position lamp (55% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (55% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Direction indicators (69% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Flashing type (69% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Individual direction indicators (79% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.081% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.73% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.49% fail on Horn
      • 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.081% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.32% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (76% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp (76% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp (76% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.16% fail on Switch
    • 0.081% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 9.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.49% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (71% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.081% fail on Airbags
      • 0.081% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 9.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Transmission (55% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts (59% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Joints (61% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.081% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.24% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.24% fail on Joints
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust system (62% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.57% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Pipe
      • 0.081% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.73% fail on Body
      • 0.41% fail on Panel
      • 0.32% fail on Other body component
    • 0.49% fail on Floor (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Seats
      • 0.16% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.16% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.16% fail on Doors
      • 0.16% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.16% fail on Door condition
    • 0.081% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.081% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.081% fail on Carrier
    • 0.081% fail on Cabs
      • 0.081% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 6.2% fail on Visibility (27% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers (34% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.57% fail on View to rear
      • 0.57% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.32% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.24% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.081% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.081% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.5% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth (53% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.081% fail on Size/type
  • 3.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (53% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (65% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Spark ignition (65% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (59% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (66% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.081% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.081% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.081% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.32% fail on Compression ignition (71% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.081% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.081% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.16% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.081% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.57% fail on Steering (88% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Steering linkage components (90% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Track rod end (95% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.081% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.24% fail on Power steering
      • 0.16% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.081% fail on Other components
  • 0.49% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.49% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.49% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Condition
    • 0.24% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages