MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Ford » Puma » 2002

Ford Puma MOT Results

Registered in 2002
56.8% pass rate
from 767 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Puma is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension (53% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Pins and bushes (63% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.78% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.26% fail on Suspension arm
    • 4.0% fail on Springs
      • 3.9% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.9% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.13% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.1% fail on Sub-frames (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Sub-frame
    • 2.3% fail on Axles (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (17 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.91% fail on Macpherson strut (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.52% fail on Anti-roll bars (89% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.52% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.13% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 7.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (58% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (57% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.65% fail on Service brake performance (75% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.65% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.91% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.91% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.78% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.78% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system (91% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (58% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.65% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.39% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.39% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.13% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.13% fail on Cable
    • 1.0% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Other braking system component (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal
    • 0.13% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.13% fail on Lever
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (37% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp (43% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (71% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.65% fail on Direction indicators (71% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Flashing type (71% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.65% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.65% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.65% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.52% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.52% fail on Horn
    • 0.13% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.13% fail on Position lamp
  • 9.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Chassis (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis condition (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Transmission (53% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts (58% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Joints (57% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.26% fail on Joints
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system (62% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Body (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Other body component (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Panel
    • 0.65% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.39% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Tank
      • 0.13% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.65% fail on Floor (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Seats
      • 0.26% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.26% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.26% fail on Cabs
      • 0.26% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.13% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.13% fail on Door condition
    • 0.13% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.13% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 7.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 0.26% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (83% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Airbags
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 5.7% fail on Visibility
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.13% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.13% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (47% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (57% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Spark ignition (52% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (56% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (60% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.13% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.13% fail on Catalytic converter
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.78% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.26% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 0.52% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.26% fail on Steering (94% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.26% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages