Ford Puma MOT Results

Registered in 2002
47.8% pass rate
from 1,864 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Puma is unusually good or bad.

  • 33% fail on Suspension (50% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 19% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 14% fail on Component mounting (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Subframe mounting (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Spring mounting
    • 4.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.054% fail on Condition
      • 0.054% fail on Attachment
    • 3.5% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.4% fail on Condition
      • 0.054% fail on Location
    • 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings (73% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Rear (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Front (86% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Trailing arms (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Attachment (19 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Sub-frames (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (20 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Drive shafts (54% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Front drive shafts (56% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (58% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (67% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.80% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (80% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
      • 0.054% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.75% fail on Front suspension joints (51% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Axles (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Axle beam (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Swivel joints/housing (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Stub axle
    • 0.27% fail on Bonded suspension (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Attachment
    • 0.27% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.054% fail on Attachment
  • 24% fail on Brakes (42% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 16% fail on Hydraulic systems (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 16% fail on Components (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 11% fail on Pipes (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 6.8% fail on Hoses (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.11% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.97% fail on Leaks (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.054% fail on Operation
    • 6.4% fail on Brake performance (27% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.8% fail on Parking brake performance (36% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Front wheels (46% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.48% fail on Brake performance not tested (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Service brake performance
    • 4.3% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components (44% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.91% fail on Brake pads (62% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.86% fail on Electronic stability system (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Parking brake (74% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Condition (74% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.21% fail on Pedal
        • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.21% fail on Cable
    • 0.11% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.054% fail on Components
        • 0.054% fail on Servos
      • 0.054% fail on Leaks
    • 0.054% fail on Restricted movement
  • 15% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (43% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim (40% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (41% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps (48% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp (46% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp (65% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Position lamps (74% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Front lamps (77% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Rear lamps (68% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Direction indicators (68% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Flashing type (68% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Individual lamps (78% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.054% fail on Switch
    • 0.70% fail on Rear fog lamp (54% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Fog lamp (53% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.70% fail on Horn
    • 0.38% fail on Battery (60% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 8.9% fail on Tyres
    • 5.6% fail on Condition (44% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth (32% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Size/type
    • 0.054% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (87% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (86% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 8.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.43% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.32% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.27% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Seats
      • 0.16% fail on Passengers
      • 0.16% fail on Drivers
    • 0.27% fail on Spare wheel (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Doors (77% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.054% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.054% fail on Load security
      • 0.054% fail on Access panel
  • 3.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (54% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions (61% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust system (73% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.43% fail on System
      • 0.27% fail on Tank
      • 0.16% fail on Cap
      • 0.054% fail on Hose
      • 0.054% fail on Pipe
    • 0.54% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (77% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Power steering
      • 0.43% fail on Operation (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.054% fail on Other components
    • 0.48% fail on Steering system (89% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.054% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.054% fail on Steering operation
  • 1.1% fail on Road Wheels (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Attachment
  • 0.59% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.59% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages