MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Ford » Puma » 2000

Ford Puma MOT Results

Registered in 2000
60.1% pass rate
from 878 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Puma is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Suspension (34% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.91% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint (65% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.80% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.80% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings (91% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Springs
      • 1.6% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.6% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.23% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Axles (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Axle (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.91% fail on Pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.0% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.68% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.46% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 7.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (54% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (63% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.23% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
    • 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.57% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.68% fail on Mechanical brake components (69% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.34% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.23% fail on Brake linings and pads (84% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Brake pads (84% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.23% fail on Cable
    • 0.23% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.11% fail on Pedal
      • 0.11% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.23% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.23% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Transmission
      • 3.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.3% fail on Joints
        • 0.11% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.11% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.11% fail on Joints
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.9% fail on Chassis
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.11% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.46% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.23% fail on Tank
      • 0.23% fail on Pipe
    • 0.34% fail on Body
      • 0.23% fail on Panel
      • 0.11% fail on Body condition
    • 0.34% fail on Cabs
      • 0.34% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.23% fail on Seats
      • 0.23% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.11% fail on Doors
      • 0.11% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
    • 0.11% fail on Floor
  • 9.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (37% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp (53% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.11% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.7% fail on Stop lamp (56% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Direction indicators (70% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Flashing type (70% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Individual direction indicators (77% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.46% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.46% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.46% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.46% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.23% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.23% fail on Horn
    • 0.34% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (79% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 5.1% fail on Visibility (34% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers (47% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on View to rear
      • 0.11% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.3% fail on Seat belts (73% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Prescribed areas (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.68% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Airbags
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (44% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (46% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Spark ignition (42% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.80% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (84% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.34% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.34% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (70% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Power steering
      • 0.46% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
    • 0.23% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.23% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.23% fail on Steering linkage components (90% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.11% fail on Steering play
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.68% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.57% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.46% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment
  • 0.11% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.11% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages