Ford Puma MOT Results

Registered in 2000
47.6% pass rate
from 2,139 tests in 2017
(6.7% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Puma is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Suspension (45% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 15% fail on Prescribed areas (200% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 11% fail on Component mounting (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Subframe mounting (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Spring mounting
    • 5.8% fail on Drive shafts (33% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Front drive shafts (33% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 5.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (32% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.094% fail on Couplings
      • 0.094% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.094% fail on Drive shafts
    • 5.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment
      • 0.047% fail on Condition
    • 4.5% fail on Wheel bearings (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Rear (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Front
    • 3.0% fail on Trailing arms (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Attachment
    • 3.0% fail on Shock absorbers (86% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Condition (86% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (43% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (40% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment
      • 0.047% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.8% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Front suspension joints (63% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Coil springs (52% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Condition (53% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Location
    • 0.42% fail on Radius arms (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Axles (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Axle beam
      • 0.14% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.14% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.094% fail on Condition
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment
    • 0.047% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment
  • 24% fail on Brakes (40% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 13% fail on Hydraulic systems (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 13% fail on Components (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 8.6% fail on Pipes (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.094% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.61% fail on Leaks
      • 0.19% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 4.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.84% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.70% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.047% fail on Brake operation
    • 3.7% fail on ABS (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.89% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.094% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.047% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.047% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.70% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.70% fail on Condition
    • 0.65% fail on Electronic stability system (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Mechanical components (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.37% fail on Pedal
        • 0.28% fail on Condition
        • 0.094% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.33% fail on Restricted movement
  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (23% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.23% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Dipswitch (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.047% fail on Headlamp levelling device
        • 0.047% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (28% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Position lamps (47% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Front lamps (55% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.094% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.0% fail on Stop lamp (46% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators (44% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type (44% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.23% fail on Side repeaters (74% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.094% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.047% fail on Switch
    • 0.98% fail on Horn (79% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Rear fog lamp (59% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Fog lamp (58% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Battery (53% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.23% fail on Lamp
      • 0.094% fail on Switch
    • 0.23% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 9.5% fail on Tyres
    • 5.3% fail on Condition (42% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.19% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 9.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.6% fail on Emissions (27% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.37% fail on Cap
      • 0.28% fail on Tank
      • 0.28% fail on Pipe
      • 0.23% fail on System
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 8.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (77% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Seat belts (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Prescribed areas (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Condition (74% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.98% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.14% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 8.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers (33% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.70% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.094% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (55% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Body condition (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Vehicle structure (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Chassis (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Seats
      • 0.094% fail on Drivers
      • 0.047% fail on Passengers
    • 0.094% fail on Doors (85% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.047% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.047% fail on Spare wheel
  • 1.7% fail on Steering (63% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Power steering
      • 0.47% fail on Operation
      • 0.42% fail on Pipes and hoses (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Pump
    • 0.84% fail on Steering system (79% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Steering rack (73% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.047% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.047% fail on Steering arm
  • 1.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.56% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.28% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages