Ford Puma MOT Results

Registered in 2000
54.4% pass rate
from 1,330 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Puma is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Suspension (44% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Pins and bushes (77% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.5% fail on Wheel bearings (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Shock absorbers (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Sub-frames (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Sub-frame
    • 2.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (46% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.30% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (82% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.075% fail on Linkage
    • 1.8% fail on Springs
      • 1.7% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.6% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.075% fail on Mounting
      • 0.15% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.6% fail on Axles (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Axle
    • 1.6% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.075% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.075% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.075% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.075% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 7.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance (69% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (75% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance (70% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.38% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (46% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (45% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (44% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.45% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.45% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.75% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (48% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (83% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Electronic stability control (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.83% fail on Brake linings and pads (58% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.83% fail on Brake pads (57% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.38% fail on Cable
    • 0.98% fail on Flexible brake hoses (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.23% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal
    • 0.30% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.30% fail on Lever
    • 0.15% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.15% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.15% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.075% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.075% fail on Master cylinder
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure (27% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Transmission (53% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Drive shafts (50% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Joints (52% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.45% fail on Joints
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Chassis
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.45% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.15% fail on Pipe
      • 0.075% fail on System
    • 0.75% fail on Body
      • 0.60% fail on Panel (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Other body component
    • 0.60% fail on Floor (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Seats
      • 0.23% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.15% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.075% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.075% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.075% fail on Carrier
    • 0.075% fail on Doors
      • 0.075% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.075% fail on Door condition
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (34% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.75% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.15% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.075% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp (51% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Position lamp (41% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (52% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.75% fail on Horn
      • 0.075% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.75% fail on Direction indicators (69% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Flashing type (69% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Individual direction indicators (76% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.15% fail on Side repeaters (81% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (69% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Rear fog lamp (69% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Rear fog lamp (73% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 0.23% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.23% fail on Switch
    • 0.23% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.075% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.075% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 7.2% fail on Visibility
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.60% fail on View to rear
      • 0.60% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.23% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.15% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.075% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.075% fail on Window
  • 6.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (47% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Seat belts (96% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Prescribed areas (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.23% fail on Airbags
      • 0.23% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 6.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (34% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (36% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Spark ignition (31% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (29% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.53% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (74% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.23% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.075% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.23% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.15% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.075% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 0.60% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.60% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.075% fail on Size/type
  • 1.3% fail on Steering (69% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Power steering
      • 0.38% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.23% fail on Other components
      • 0.075% fail on Operation
    • 0.30% fail on Steering gear (70% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.23% fail on Steering linkage components (92% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.075% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.075% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.075% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.75% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.45% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment
    • 0.075% fail on Hubs
  • 0.68% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages