MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Ford » Puma » 1999

Ford Puma MOT Results

Registered in 1999
54.1% pass rate
from 499 tests in 2021
(16% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Puma is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Brakes (77% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 9.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 5.8% fail on Rbt (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.40% fail on Plate brake tester (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 5.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 4.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 2.8% fail on Parking brake performance (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.20% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.60% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.0% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Cable (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Lever
    • 0.80% fail on Hydraulic systems (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Brake fluid (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Valves
    • 0.60% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.40% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.40% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal
    • 0.40% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.40% fail on Lever
    • 0.20% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.20% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.20% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.20% fail on Other braking system component
  • 21% fail on Suspension (42% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.8% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 4.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.8% fail on Sub-frames (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes (16 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Springs
      • 2.4% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.4% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.4% fail on Axles (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.60% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.20% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.20% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure (43% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Transmission (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 5.8% fail on Joints (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.40% fail on Joints
    • 4.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.0% fail on Chassis
      • 1.0% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.80% fail on Body
      • 0.60% fail on Panel
      • 0.20% fail on Body condition
    • 0.60% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.40% fail on Pipe
      • 0.20% fail on Tank
    • 0.40% fail on Floor
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.20% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.80% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.40% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.80% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.60% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.60% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.60% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.40% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.20% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.20% fail on Horn
    • 0.20% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 8.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 7.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 5.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.40% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.20% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.20% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.20% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.80% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.60% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Other leaks
  • 5.8% fail on Visibility
    • 3.6% fail on Washers
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.20% fail on View to rear
      • 0.20% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.80% fail on Steering (78% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.40% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.40% fail on Power steering
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
      • 0.20% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 0.60% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.60% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages