Ford Puma MOT Results

Registered in 1999
45.4% pass rate
from 1,384 tests in 2017
(12% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Puma is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Suspension (44% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 14% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 10.0% fail on Component mounting (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Subframe mounting (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Spring mounting
    • 7.8% fail on Drive shafts (98% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Front drive shafts (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 7.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Suspension arms (68% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (73% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 3.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (34% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.51% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.43% fail on Attachment
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage condition
    • 3.2% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 2.7% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Shock absorbers (71% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Condition (71% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Sub-frames (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (15 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 1.6% fail on Trailing arms (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.2% fail on Rear
      • 0.29% fail on Front
    • 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.51% fail on Axles (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Swivel joints/housing (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Axle beam
    • 0.14% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 28% fail on Brakes (61% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 16% fail on Hydraulic systems (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 15% fail on Components (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 9.1% fail on Pipes (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 8.4% fail on Hoses (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Reservoirs (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Cylinders
      • 1.6% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.072% fail on Operation
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (57% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Parking brake performance (94% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Rear wheels (70% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Front wheels (81% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.94% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.43% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.4% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Hub components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.072% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.072% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.0% fail on Electronic stability system (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.22% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.22% fail on Pedal
        • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.14% fail on Cable
    • 0.072% fail on Additional braking devices
  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.22% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.072% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.0% fail on Stop lamp (64% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.2% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators (59% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type (59% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.94% fail on Individual lamps (49% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Side repeaters (81% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.072% fail on Switch
    • 0.87% fail on Horn
    • 0.65% fail on Battery
    • 0.29% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.14% fail on Switch
      • 0.072% fail on Lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.072% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 11% fail on Tyres (34% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Condition (68% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
    • 0.072% fail on Valve stem
  • 10% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (93% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 10% fail on Seat belts (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 9.8% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Requirements
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
      • 0.072% fail on Attachment
    • 0.51% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (71% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (68% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 9.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.7% fail on Emissions (46% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.87% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.36% fail on Tank
      • 0.36% fail on Cap
      • 0.072% fail on Pipe
      • 0.072% fail on System
  • 8.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.79% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.65% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.072% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (52% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Body condition (62% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Vehicle structure (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Chassis (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Passengers
      • 0.14% fail on Drivers
    • 0.14% fail on Doors (79% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Drivers
      • 0.072% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.072% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.072% fail on Spare wheel
  • 1.6% fail on Steering (65% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Steering system (74% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.43% fail on Track rod end (81% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.51% fail on Power steering
      • 0.36% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
    • 0.072% fail on Steering control
      • 0.072% fail on Steering column
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages