Ford Probe MOT Results

Registered in 1995

57.8% pass rate

from 116 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Probe is unusually good or bad.

18% fail on Suspension
- 13% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (190% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Springs
  - 2.6% fail on Coil springs
    - 2.6% fail on Coil spring
  - 0.86% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
- 2.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 0.86% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.86% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.86% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.7% fail on Suspension arms
  - 1.7% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.86% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.86% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.86% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
16% fail on Brakes
- 10% fail on Brake performance
  - 6.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 6.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 4.3% fail on Service brake performance
      - 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 5.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 5.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
    - 2.6% fail on Rbt
      - 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.86% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 1.7% fail on Rbt
      - 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.7% fail on Parking brake control
  - 1.7% fail on Lever
- 1.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 1.7% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 1.7% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (13 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 1.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.86% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.86% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.86% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 0.86% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 0.86% fail on Brake pads
15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 7.8% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 7.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 5.2% fail on Headlamps
  - 5.2% fail on Headlamp
- 2.6% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
  - 2.6% fail on Flashing type
    - 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.86% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.86% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.86% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.86% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.86% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.86% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.86% fail on Horn
10% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 9.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 9.5% fail on Spark ignition
    - 7.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
  - 0.86% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.86% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.86% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.86% fail on Engine oil leaks
9.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 6.9% fail on Transmission (190% worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 6.9% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    - 6.9% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.86% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 0.86% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.86% fail on Chassis
  - 0.86% fail on Chassis condition
6.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 4.3% fail on Seat belts
  - 4.3% fail on Prescribed areas
- 3.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
6.9% fail on Tyres
- 4.3% fail on Condition
- 3.4% fail on Tread depth
- 0.86% fail on Size/type
5.2% fail on Visibility
- 4.3% fail on Wipers
- 0.86% fail on Washers
1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 1.7% fail on Registration plates