Ford Probe MOT Results

Registered in 1994
54.2% pass rate
from 72 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Probe is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Suspension (120% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 18% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.4% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 9.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 8.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 5.6% fail on Rbt (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
          • 5.6% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
    • 5.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system (8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 14% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 14% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 14% fail on Spark ignition (120% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 11% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.8% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.4% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.9% fail on Transmission
      • 5.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 5.6% fail on Joints
      • 1.4% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Joints
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.4% fail on Chassis
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis condition
  • 8.3% fail on Visibility
    • 6.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on View to rear
      • 1.4% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 4.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (12 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
  • 2.8% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plates
  • 2.8% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.4% fail on Power steering
      • 1.4% fail on Operation
  • 1.4% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.4% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages