Ford Mustang MOT Results

Registered in 2016
87.2% pass rate
from 2,721 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Mustang is unusually good or bad.

  • 3.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth (51% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.037% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 3.4% fail on Suspension (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Suspension arms (16 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Ball joint (36 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.44% fail on Wheel bearings (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Other suspension component (20 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint (49 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Suspension rods (57 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Ball joint (100 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.074% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 1.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (50% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Headlamp aim (50% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Headlamp aim (51% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.26% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.26% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.26% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.037% fail on Switch
    • 0.18% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.18% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.15% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.11% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.11% fail on Headlamps (78% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp (73% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.074% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.074% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.037% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.037% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.037% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.037% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.88% fail on Visibility (69% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Washers
    • 0.15% fail on Wipers (92% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.074% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.074% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.074% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.037% fail on View to rear
      • 0.037% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.81% fail on Brakes (60% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Mechanical brake components (77% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Brake linings and pads (75% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Brake pads (74% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.26% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.074% fail on Rbt
          • 0.037% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.037% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.037% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.037% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.037% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.037% fail on Rbt
          • 0.037% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.11% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.11% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.037% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.037% fail on Valves
    • 0.037% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.037% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 0.70% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.66% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.66% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Catalyst emissions (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.037% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.037% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.037% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.037% fail on Catalytic converter
    • 0.037% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.037% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.18% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.074% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.074% fail on Transmission
      • 0.074% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.074% fail on Joints
    • 0.037% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.037% fail on Bracket
  • 0.11% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.074% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.037% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.037% fail on Requirements
  • 0.037% fail on Steering
    • 0.037% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.037% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.037% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.037% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Ford Mustang (2015 on)
    Guaranteed to get attention. 5.0-litre V8 sounds fantastic engine. No other car can match the V8 for pound-per-horsepower.

    Search Good Garages