Ford Mondeo MOT Results
Registered in 201684.2% pass rate
from 16,819 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Mondeo is unusually good or bad.
-
5.1% fail on
Tyres
(30% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Tread depth (64% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 0.083% fail on Size/type
-
4.1% fail on
Visibility
- 3.5% fail on Wipers (22% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Washers (43% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.036% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.036% fail on Windscreen
- 0.018% fail on Driver's view
-
0.018% fail on
View to rear
- 0.012% fail on Mirrors
- 0.0059% fail on Indirect vision devices
- 0.012% fail on Bonnet
-
3.6% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.012% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (81% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Direction indicators
(120% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Flashing type
(120% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Side repeaters (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.79% fail on
Flashing type
(120% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Headlamps
(48% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Headlamp (44% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.11% fail on Stop lamp (82% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.071% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.030% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.012% fail on Horn
- 0.0059% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.042% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.024% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.024% fail on Position lamp
-
0.018% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(90% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(94% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Rear fog lamp (94% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0059% fail on
Front fog lamps
- 0.0059% fail on Front fog lamps
-
0.012% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(94% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.018% fail on Reversing lamps
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
2.8% fail on
Brakes
-
2.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(26% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(39% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Brake pads (39% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0059% fail on Brake linings
-
0.49% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.49% fail on Brake discs
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(39% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Brake performance
(49% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Service brake performance
(45% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Rbt
(45% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Service brake performance (44% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.0059% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0059% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.22% fail on
Rbt
(45% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.065% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(72% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.065% fail on Rbt (sp) (70% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.054% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.054% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.030% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.024% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.054% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.036% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.036% fail on
Parking brake performance
(63% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.036% fail on
Rbt
- 0.036% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.036% fail on
Rbt
-
0.23% fail on
Service brake performance
(45% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.065% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.054% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.036% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.054% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.030% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.018% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.012% fail on Reservoirs
-
0.030% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.030% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.024% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(71% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Pedal
-
0.018% fail on
Parking brake control
(84% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Electronic parking brake
-
0.0059% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.0059% fail on Servos
-
2.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(26% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Suspension
(71% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Suspension arms
(43% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint
- 0.071% fail on Pins and bushes (71% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.012% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.12% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.054% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.030% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Linkage ball joints (77% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0059% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.0059% fail on Linkage
- 0.0059% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
0.042% fail on
Springs
(96% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.042% fail on
Coil springs
(96% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.042% fail on Coil spring (96% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.042% fail on
Coil springs
(96% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Wheel bearings (72% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.0059% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0059% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.012% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.0059% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0059% fail on Ball joint
-
0.0059% fail on
Axles
- 0.0059% fail on Stub axle
-
0.28% fail on
Suspension arms
(43% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(50% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(57% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Compression ignition
(34% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (57% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.077% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.030% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.012% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0059% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.0059% fail on Other emission control equipment
-
0.12% fail on
Spark ignition
(75% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.077% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (74% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Catalyst emissions (83% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.23% fail on
Compression ignition
(34% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.065% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.059% fail on Engine oil leaks (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0059% fail on Other leaks
-
0.0059% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.0059% fail on Sound deadening material
-
0.34% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(57% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.21% fail on Registration plates
-
0.20% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(64% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.089% fail on
Transmission
(59% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.077% fail on
Drive shafts
(61% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.077% fail on Joints (61% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.012% fail on Joints
-
0.077% fail on
Drive shafts
(61% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.042% fail on
Body
- 0.030% fail on Other body component
- 0.012% fail on Panel
-
0.018% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.012% fail on Pipe
- 0.0059% fail on System
- 0.012% fail on Bumpers
-
0.012% fail on
Doors
-
0.012% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.0059% fail on Door condition
- 0.0059% fail on Catch
-
0.012% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.012% fail on Undertray
- 0.0059% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.0059% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.0059% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.089% fail on
Transmission
(59% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.17% fail on Attachment
- 0.030% fail on Condition
-
0.18% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.14% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.14% fail on Condition
- 0.048% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (60% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.036% fail on
Steering
(87% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.018% fail on Steering rack
-
0.018% fail on
Steering linkage components
(92% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0059% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0059% fail on Track rod end
- 0.0059% fail on Locking devices
-
0.018% fail on
Steering gear
Read the Honest John Review
-
Ford Mondeo (2015 - 2021)
Impressive quality and refinement. Rides well with keen handling. Very spacious and practical interior.