Ford Mondeo MOT Results

Registered in 2016
84.7% pass rate
from 18,362 tests in 2020
(23% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Mondeo is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.2% fail on Tyres (47% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.060% fail on Size/type
    • 0.060% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 4.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (27% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.016% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.065% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.011% fail on All direction indicators
      • 0.0054% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.0054% fail on Arm
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Position lamps (56% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.027% fail on All position lamps (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Headlamps (58% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp (51% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.076% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.033% fail on Horn
      • 0.016% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.016% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.011% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.049% fail on Stop lamp (87% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.022% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.022% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.011% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (93% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Rear fog lamp (93% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Rear fog lamp (93% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 3.6% fail on Visibility (27% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers (44% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Washers
    • 0.13% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.13% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.098% fail on View to rear (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Mirrors (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.0054% fail on Bonnet
  • 2.6% fail on Brakes (30% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (63% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (63% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Brake pads (64% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Brake discs and drums (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Brake discs (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Brake performance (40% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.17% fail on Rbt
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.049% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.049% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.049% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.033% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.022% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.027% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (77% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.027% fail on Rbt (sp) (76% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.060% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.060% fail on Pedal
    • 0.044% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.016% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.016% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.016% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.011% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.0054% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.011% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.011% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.0054% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0054% fail on Servos
    • 0.0054% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.0054% fail on Electronic parking brake
  • 0.36% fail on Suspension (42% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.087% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.022% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0054% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.038% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.027% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.011% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.0054% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0054% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0054% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.011% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.011% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.30% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.20% fail on Exhaust emissions (44% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.044% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.044% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (63% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.011% fail on Emission control equipment (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.0054% fail on Oxygen sensor
          • 0.0054% fail on NOx sensor
      • 0.087% fail on Spark ignition (54% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.076% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.0054% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.0054% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.093% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Engine oil leaks (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.011% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.011% fail on Undertray
  • 0.23% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.065% fail on Body
      • 0.060% fail on Other body component
      • 0.0054% fail on Panel
    • 0.060% fail on Transmission
      • 0.060% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.054% fail on Joints
        • 0.0054% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.022% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.016% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.0054% fail on Tank
      • 0.0054% fail on Pipe
      • 0.0054% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.016% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.016% fail on Undertray
    • 0.011% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.011% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.011% fail on Seats
      • 0.011% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.0054% fail on Towbar
      • 0.0054% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.0054% fail on Doors
      • 0.0054% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.0054% fail on Door condition
    • 0.0054% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0054% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 0.20% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.20% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.19% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.11% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
      • 0.0054% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.071% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.082% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.065% fail on Attachment
    • 0.016% fail on Condition
  • 0.011% fail on Steering (91% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Steering linkage components (88% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0054% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.0054% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0054% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • Ford Mondeo (2015 on)
    Impressive quality and refinement initially made it stand out from the competition. Rides well with keen handling. Very spacious and practical interior.
  • Ford Mondeo Estate (2015 on)
    Excellent blend of enjoyable driving and comfort. Spacious load area. Practical and well finished cabin. Well priced.

    Search Good Garages