Ford Mondeo MOT Results

Registered in 2005
50.9% pass rate
from 27,618 tests in 2017
(9.0% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Mondeo is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension (20% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.3% fail on Coil springs (83% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Condition (79% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Location (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (22% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (17% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment (82% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Condition
      • 0.0072% fail on Presence
    • 4.9% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Front (51% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Drive shafts (23% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Front drive shafts (22% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (23% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.018% fail on Couplings
      • 0.036% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.036% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms (37% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (36% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Condition (59% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Attachment (52% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers (46% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Condition (46% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Front suspension joints (25% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Macpherson strut (45% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Condition (45% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Tie bars/rods (60% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (53% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment
    • 0.32% fail on Trailing arms (44% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.069% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment
    • 0.28% fail on Sub-frames (43% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Condition
      • 0.054% fail on Attachment (99% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Prescribed areas (72% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Component mounting (68% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Subframe mounting (92% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0072% fail on Spring mounting (83% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.069% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.014% fail on Condition
      • 0.0072% fail on Attachment
    • 0.018% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.014% fail on General condition
    • 0.0072% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.0036% fail on Condition
      • 0.0036% fail on Attachment
    • 0.0072% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.0036% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.0036% fail on Attachment
    • 0.0036% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.0036% fail on Suspension unit
  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (9.0% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 11% fail on Position lamps (76% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Front lamps (52% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Rear lamps (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on All position lamps (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0036% fail on Switch
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp (7.9% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim (37% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators (23% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type (23% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Individual lamps (26% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.37% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.025% fail on Tell tales
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps (53% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp (55% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.076% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
        • 0.014% fail on Headlamp levelling device
        • 0.0072% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.072% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.040% fail on Headlamp levelling device
        • 0.033% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
        • 0.011% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.011% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.0036% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (68% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Rear fog lamp (53% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Fog lamp (52% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.0036% fail on Switch
    • 0.39% fail on Battery (38% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Rear reflectors (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Horn (76% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (52% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Trailer electrical socket (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.014% fail on Hazard warning (85% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Switch (80% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0036% fail on Lamp
  • 21% fail on Brakes (56% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 10% fail on Hydraulic systems (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 9.4% fail on Components (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 7.0% fail on Pipes (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Reservoirs (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.072% fail on Cylinders (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.0036% fail on Servos
        • 0.0036% fail on Pump
      • 1.1% fail on Leaks (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.072% fail on Operation
    • 8.8% fail on Brake performance (29% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Parking brake performance (41% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Rear wheels (59% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.47% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.30% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.022% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.0036% fail on Parking brake operation
    • 5.2% fail on Hub components (50% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Brake pads (27% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs (51% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake calipers (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Brake linings
    • 1.6% fail on Parking brake (84% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (97% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0036% fail on Fitment
    • 0.79% fail on ABS
    • 0.43% fail on Mechanical components (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Cable (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Lever
      • 0.011% fail on Linkage
      • 0.011% fail on Pivot
    • 0.37% fail on Restricted movement (38% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.22% fail on Pedal
        • 0.15% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.072% fail on Condition
    • 0.098% fail on Electronic stability system (57% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.036% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.029% fail on Components
        • 0.011% fail on Pipes
        • 0.011% fail on Servos
        • 0.0072% fail on Hoses
      • 0.0072% fail on Leaks
      • 0.0036% fail on Warning
      • 0.0036% fail on Operation
    • 0.0036% fail on Additional braking devices
  • 9.6% fail on Tyres (9.4% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.9% fail on Condition (26% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Size/type
    • 0.080% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (58% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust system (52% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Emissions (54% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Emissions not tested (70% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.32% fail on System (59% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Cap
      • 0.018% fail on Tank (82% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Pipe
      • 0.011% fail on Hose
  • 6.6% fail on Driver's view of the road (14% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Washers (41% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.23% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.13% fail on Mirrors (56% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 4.5% fail on Steering (12% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Steering system (11% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Track rod end (37% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Steering rack (50% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.094% fail on Free play
        • 0.094% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.033% fail on Steering arm (76% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Drag link end (82% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0036% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.0036% fail on Other components
        • 0.0036% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.41% fail on Power steering
      • 0.29% fail on Operation (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Other components
      • 0.054% fail on Pump (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Pipes and hoses (61% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Rams
      • 0.0036% fail on Drive system
    • 0.13% fail on Steering operation (91% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Steering control
      • 0.011% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.011% fail on Steering column
      • 0.0036% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.0036% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.0036% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.018% fail on Locking devices
  • 1.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (54% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Seat belts (39% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Condition
      • 0.091% fail on Prescribed areas (84% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Requirements
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0036% fail on Installation check
        • 0.0036% fail on Anchorage's
    • 0.47% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (66% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (65% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Drivers airbag (80% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (21% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Doors (37% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Passengers front (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Passengers other (57% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Body condition (48% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Seats
      • 0.083% fail on Drivers
      • 0.051% fail on Passengers
    • 0.036% fail on Vehicle structure (77% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Chassis (77% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Body security
    • 0.022% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.018% fail on Load security
      • 0.018% fail on Access panel
    • 0.014% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.87% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.87% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.0072% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.56% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.39% fail on Attachment
    • 0.16% fail on Condition
  • 0.022% fail on Towbars
    • 0.018% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.0036% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages