Ford Mondeo MOT Results
Registered in 200253.5% pass rate
from 3,939 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Mondeo is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Suspension
(30% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Springs
(93% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Coil springs
(96% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Coil spring (95% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Mounting
- 0.076% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
6.9% fail on
Coil springs
(96% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(41% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (60% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Ball joint dust cover (85% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.46% fail on Ball joint
- 0.23% fail on Linkage
- 0.23% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (58% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.025% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
5.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Suspension arm (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Pins and bushes (60% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Ball joint (66% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 4.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 3.2% fail on Wheel bearings (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Sub-frames
(89% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.38% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.025% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.56% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.23% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.051% fail on Ball joint dust cover (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.025% fail on Ball joint
-
0.23% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.076% fail on Ball joint
- 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.025% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes
-
7.0% fail on
Springs
(93% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
19% fail on
Brakes
(33% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(54% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 8.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.025% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
5.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.10% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.076% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
5.3% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt
- 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.46% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.051% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.051% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt
-
0.96% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(52% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(51% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Service brake imbalance (57% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.96% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(51% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Brake performance not tested (87% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (65% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(37% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.2% fail on Brake pads
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
-
0.99% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Cable (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Linkage (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.94% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(37% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.076% fail on Electronic stability control (78% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.91% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(62% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Hand lever (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Pedal
-
0.81% fail on
Parking brake control
(91% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Lever (93% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.28% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.28% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.076% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.051% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.025% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.025% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.025% fail on Operation
- 0.025% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.025% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.025% fail on Other components
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(54% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
11% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(37% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Stop lamp (34% better than other 2002 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamps
(40% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp (42% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.025% fail on Dipswitch
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
(38% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (39% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.91% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.84% fail on Individual direction indicators (45% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.025% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.86% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (61% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(65% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(65% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Rear fog lamp (65% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(65% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.25% fail on Position lamp
-
0.18% fail on
Electrical equipment
(77% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Horn (80% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.051% fail on Battery(ies) (85% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.10% fail on Switch
- 0.025% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.025% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.025% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
8.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(19% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Transmission
(22% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.7% fail on Joints
- 0.025% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.051% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.051% fail on Joints
-
2.7% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.6% fail on Exhaust system (25% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.99% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.051% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.051% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
0.99% fail on
Chassis
- 0.99% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.53% fail on
Doors
-
0.30% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.28% fail on Door condition
- 0.025% fail on Catch
-
0.20% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.18% fail on Door condition
- 0.025% fail on Catch
-
0.025% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.025% fail on Door condition
-
0.30% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.28% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.13% fail on Pipe
- 0.076% fail on Tank
- 0.025% fail on Hose
- 0.025% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.025% fail on System
- 0.20% fail on Bumpers
-
0.20% fail on
Seats
- 0.13% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.076% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.13% fail on
Body
- 0.10% fail on Other body component
- 0.025% fail on Panel
-
0.10% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.076% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.025% fail on Bracket
-
0.076% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.051% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.025% fail on Other boot lid component
- 0.051% fail on Floor
-
0.025% fail on
Cabs
- 0.025% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.025% fail on Passenger compartment
-
2.8% fail on
Transmission
(22% better than other 2002 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.0% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.20% fail on Non catalyst emissions (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.84% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.076% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.051% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.025% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.025% fail on Catalytic converter
-
6.0% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.53% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.41% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.10% fail on Other leaks
- 0.025% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
7.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.4% fail on
Visibility
- 3.8% fail on Washers
- 3.7% fail on Wipers
-
0.20% fail on
View to rear
- 0.20% fail on Mirrors
- 0.13% fail on Bonnet
-
0.13% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.13% fail on Windscreen
-
6.5% fail on
Tyres
- 3.6% fail on Condition (42% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Tread depth
- 0.15% fail on Size/type
-
3.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts
(55% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.025% fail on Attachment
- 0.025% fail on Requirements
- 0.41% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (74% better than other 2002 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts
(55% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Steering
(41% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
(32% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Track rod end (25% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Locking devices
-
0.30% fail on
Power steering
- 0.13% fail on Operation
- 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.051% fail on Other components
- 0.025% fail on Pump
- 0.025% fail on Rams
-
0.28% fail on
Steering gear
(69% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Steering rack (80% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Operation
- 0.025% fail on Steering box
-
0.076% fail on
Steering play
- 0.076% fail on Steering rack
-
2.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
(32% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.76% fail on Registration plates
-
0.38% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.23% fail on Attachment
- 0.15% fail on Condition