Ford Mondeo MOT Results
Registered in 199952.8% pass rate
from 803 tests in 2021
(18% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Mondeo is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Suspension
(63% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 9.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (97% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(180% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.50% fail on Ball joint
- 0.25% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
8.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(97% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Ball joint
- 0.87% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.62% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
3.5% fail on
Springs
-
3.4% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.4% fail on Coil spring
- 0.12% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
3.4% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.37% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.37% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.25% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.37% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.25% fail on Ball joint
- 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.25% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.25% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
16% fail on
Brakes
(26% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(48% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(74% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (86% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.7% fail on
Rbt
- 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Rbt
-
2.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.50% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.12% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.12% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.12% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 0.75% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(74% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (79% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.0% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(160% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Brake discs (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Brake drums
-
0.75% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.75% fail on Brake pads
-
0.12% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.12% fail on Cable
-
2.0% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(160% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.37% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.25% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.50% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.37% fail on Hand lever
- 0.12% fail on Pedal
- 0.50% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.25% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.25% fail on Lever
-
0.12% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.12% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.12% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.12% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.12% fail on Other components
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(48% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.5% fail on Headlamp
- 0.37% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.37% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.25% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.12% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.87% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.50% fail on Electrical wiring (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.12% fail on Horn
-
0.50% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.50% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.50% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.50% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.25% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.25% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
0.12% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.12% fail on Position lamp
-
4.7% fail on
Headlamps
-
12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
3.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Strengthening plate
- 2.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.2% fail on
Chassis
- 2.2% fail on Chassis condition (86% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Bumpers (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Transmission
(51% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.2% fail on Joints
-
0.12% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.12% fail on Joints
-
1.2% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.87% fail on
Doors
-
0.50% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.50% fail on Door condition
-
0.37% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.37% fail on Door condition
-
0.50% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.75% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.37% fail on Tank
- 0.25% fail on Pipe
- 0.12% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.75% fail on
Body
- 0.62% fail on Panel (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Other body component
-
0.37% fail on
Seats
- 0.25% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.12% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.25% fail on Floor
-
0.12% fail on
Towbar
- 0.12% fail on Coupling
-
0.12% fail on
Cabs
- 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
-
3.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
10% fail on
Visibility
(42% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Washers (88% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Wipers
-
8.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
8.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.1% fail on
Spark ignition
- 7.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.00% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.50% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.25% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
0.12% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.12% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
-
8.1% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.25% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.12% fail on Other leaks
-
8.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(70% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Prescribed areas (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Condition (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Pre-tensioners
- 0.87% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
6.2% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Tyres
- 3.7% fail on Condition (86% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Tread depth
- 0.37% fail on Size/type
-
2.4% fail on
Steering
-
1.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.4% fail on Track rod end
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint
-
0.75% fail on
Power steering
- 0.37% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.12% fail on Operation
- 0.12% fail on Pump
- 0.12% fail on Other components
-
0.12% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.12% fail on Steering rack
-
1.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.2% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.2% fail on Registration plates
-
0.12% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.12% fail on Condition