Ford Mondeo MOT Results

Registered in 1994
55.5% pass rate
from 355 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Mondeo is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension (36% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 9.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.28% fail on Attachment
    • 7.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.6% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.85% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 5.9% fail on Suspension arms (150% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (160% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.85% fail on Location
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.1% fail on Front
      • 0.85% fail on Rear
    • 1.4% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
    • 0.85% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.85% fail on Condition
    • 0.85% fail on Drive shafts (74% better than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Front drive shafts (73% better than other 1994 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Constant velocity joints (73% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.28% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.28% fail on Attachment
    • 0.28% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.28% fail on Attachment
    • 0.28% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.28% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.28% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 4.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.28% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.8% fail on Components
        • 4.5% fail on Pipes
        • 0.28% fail on Hoses
      • 2.0% fail on Leaks (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Operation
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.56% fail on ABS
    • 0.28% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.28% fail on Cable
    • 0.28% fail on Restricted movement
  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.28% fail on Switch
    • 2.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear lamps
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (62% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.56% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.1% fail on Stop lamp (71% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Rear fog lamp (84% better than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Fog lamp (83% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.28% fail on Switch
    • 0.28% fail on Horn
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road (56% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Washers (100% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.56% fail on Windscreen
  • 13% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 9.6% fail on Emissions (73% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.28% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.28% fail on System
  • 6.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.28% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
  • 4.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.2% fail on Body condition
    • 0.28% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.28% fail on Chassis
    • 0.28% fail on Doors
      • 0.28% fail on Drivers
  • 3.7% fail on Steering
    • 2.5% fail on Steering system
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.85% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.85% fail on Power steering
      • 0.28% fail on Operation
      • 0.28% fail on Pump
      • 0.28% fail on Other components
    • 0.28% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.28% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.28% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages