Ford Maverick MOT Results
Registered in 200349.2% pass rate
from 498 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Maverick is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Suspension
(27% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
12% fail on
Prescribed areas
(4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 8.8% fail on Component mounting (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Spring mounting (23 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Subframe mounting
-
7.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 5.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.80% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.20% fail on Attachment
-
5.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.20% fail on Attachment
-
4.2% fail on
Drive shafts
-
4.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 4.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
4.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
2.0% fail on
Coil springs
(54% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Location
-
1.6% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.4% fail on Front
- 0.20% fail on Rear
- 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.60% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.60% fail on Condition
-
0.20% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.20% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.20% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.20% fail on Condition
-
0.20% fail on
Axles
- 0.20% fail on Clearance
-
12% fail on
Prescribed areas
(4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
24% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 11% fail on Registration plate lamp (62% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.8% fail on Front lamps
- 0.60% fail on Rear lamps
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp
-
3.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.0% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.60% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.60% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (61% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Stop lamp (62% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Battery
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.80% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.20% fail on Switch
- 0.80% fail on Rear reflectors (12 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.60% fail on Switch
- 0.20% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
12% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(87% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
11% fail on
Components
(92% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 8.4% fail on Hoses (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Pipes
- 0.20% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.40% fail on Leaks
- 0.20% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
11% fail on
Components
(92% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Brake performance
(58% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Rear wheels (68% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (72% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Brake performance not tested (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Front wheels (74% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.8% fail on ABS (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Hub components
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
- 1.0% fail on Brake pads
-
0.20% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.20% fail on Condition
-
0.20% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.20% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
12% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(87% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
11% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(52% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 9.0% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Emissions
-
0.60% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.40% fail on System
- 0.20% fail on Pipe
- 0.60% fail on Emissions not tested
-
6.4% fail on
Steering
-
6.0% fail on
Steering system
- 5.0% fail on Track rod end
- 0.40% fail on Ball joint
- 0.40% fail on Steering arm
-
0.20% fail on
Free play
- 0.20% fail on Steering rack
- 0.20% fail on Drag link end
-
0.40% fail on
Power steering
- 0.20% fail on Operation
- 0.20% fail on Other components
- 0.20% fail on Locking devices
-
6.0% fail on
Steering system
-
5.8% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.2% fail on Wipers
- 1.8% fail on Washers
- 0.80% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Mirrors
-
5.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(65% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Seat belts
(95% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Requirements
- 0.20% fail on Condition
-
1.8% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.8% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
3.6% fail on
Seat belts
(95% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.0% fail on Chassis
-
0.40% fail on
Doors
- 0.20% fail on Passengers front
- 0.20% fail on Passengers other
- 0.20% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.20% fail on
Seats
- 0.20% fail on Drivers
-
3.2% fail on
Tyres
(64% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Tread depth (60% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Valve stem
-
1.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate
-
0.40% fail on
Towbars
(9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Vehicle structure (12 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.20% fail on Condition