MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Ford » Maverick » 2003

Ford Maverick MOT Results

Registered in 2003
51.9% pass rate
from 185 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Maverick is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Suspension (83% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 17% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Springs (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Coil springs
        • 5.9% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.54% fail on Mounting
      • 2.7% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (38 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.54% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 8.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 3.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (200% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.6% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.6% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.54% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (82% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.9% fail on Transmission
      • 4.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.9% fail on Joints
    • 3.2% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Chassis condition (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.2% fail on Doors
      • 1.6% fail on Other passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.54% fail on Door condition
    • 1.1% fail on Body
      • 1.1% fail on Panel (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.54% fail on Cabs
      • 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 4.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.54% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.54% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.54% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.54% fail on Rbt
          • 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.8% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.7% fail on Flexible brake hoses (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.54% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.54% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.54% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.54% fail on Lever
    • 0.54% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.54% fail on Pedal
    • 0.54% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.54% fail on Lever
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.1% fail on Hazard warning (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 8.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 2.2% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.54% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.54% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.0% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Condition of glass (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Windscreen (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 5.4% fail on Steering
    • 4.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.54% fail on Steering play
      • 0.54% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Requirements
    • 0.54% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages