MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Ford » Maverick » 2003

Ford Maverick MOT Results

Registered in 2003
49.2% pass rate
from 498 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Maverick is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension (27% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 12% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 8.8% fail on Component mounting (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Spring mounting (23 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 7.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 5.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.80% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment
    • 5.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment
    • 4.2% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.0% fail on Coil springs (54% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Location
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.4% fail on Front
      • 0.20% fail on Rear
    • 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.60% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.20% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.20% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Axles
      • 0.20% fail on Clearance
  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp (62% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.60% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.60% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.60% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (61% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp (62% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Battery
    • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.80% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.20% fail on Switch
    • 0.80% fail on Rear reflectors (12 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.60% fail on Switch
    • 0.20% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Hydraulic systems (87% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 11% fail on Components (92% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 8.4% fail on Hoses (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Pipes
        • 0.20% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.40% fail on Leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Brake performance (58% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Rear wheels (68% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (72% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake performance not tested (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Front wheels (74% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on ABS (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.0% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.20% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.20% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (52% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 9.0% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Emissions
    • 0.60% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.40% fail on System
      • 0.20% fail on Pipe
    • 0.60% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 6.4% fail on Steering
    • 6.0% fail on Steering system
      • 5.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.40% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.20% fail on Free play
        • 0.20% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.20% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.40% fail on Power steering
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
      • 0.20% fail on Other components
    • 0.20% fail on Locking devices
  • 5.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.80% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (65% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Seat belts (95% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Requirements
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.8% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 4.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.0% fail on Chassis
    • 0.40% fail on Doors
      • 0.20% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.20% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.20% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.20% fail on Seats
      • 0.20% fail on Drivers
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres (64% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth (60% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.40% fail on Towbars (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Vehicle structure (12 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages