Ford Maverick MOT Results

Registered in 2002
52.3% pass rate
from 616 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Maverick is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension
    • 8.3% fail on Prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Component mounting (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Spring mounting (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Subframe mounting (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Suspension arms (56% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (61% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment
    • 6.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 5.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.97% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment
    • 3.4% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.4% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.4% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.9% fail on Front suspension joints (90% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Coil springs
      • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.5% fail on Front
      • 0.16% fail on Rear
    • 0.81% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.81% fail on Condition
    • 0.49% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.49% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.49% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.16% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.16% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 8.3% fail on Front lamps (48% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.6% fail on Individual lamps (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on All direction indicators
      • 0.16% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.16% fail on Switch
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (53% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.16% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp (64% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Battery
    • 1.5% fail on Rear reflectors (24 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.1% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.65% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.49% fail on Lamp (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Switch
      • 0.16% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.49% fail on Horn
    • 0.32% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.16% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems (71% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 11% fail on Components (77% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 7.5% fail on Hoses (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Pipes
        • 0.32% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.32% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.32% fail on Leaks
      • 0.16% fail on Operation
    • 2.9% fail on ABS (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Hub components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.16% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.9% fail on Brake performance (67% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (75% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Rear wheels (84% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.32% fail on Front wheels (88% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake operation
    • 0.49% fail on Air and vacuum systems (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Components (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Servos (16 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.16% fail on Pedal
        • 0.16% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.16% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.16% fail on Cable
    • 0.16% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.16% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 9.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.7% fail on Emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.49% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.32% fail on Pipe
      • 0.16% fail on System
  • 7.6% fail on Steering (54% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Steering system (69% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Free play (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.81% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.32% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.16% fail on Other components
        • 0.16% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.49% fail on Power steering
      • 0.32% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.16% fail on Operation
    • 0.16% fail on Locking devices
  • 5.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (98% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Body condition (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Doors
      • 0.49% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.32% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.16% fail on Drivers
    • 0.16% fail on Engine mountings
  • 5.7% fail on Driver's view of the road (40% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (56% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.16% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.6% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 2.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.32% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements
      • 0.16% fail on Installation check
        • 0.16% fail on Belt(s)/padding
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres (59% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth (51% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.65% fail on Towbars (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Vehicle structure (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages