MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Ford » Maverick » 2002

Ford Maverick MOT Results

Registered in 2002
53.2% pass rate
from 237 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Maverick is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Suspension (72% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 13% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.42% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.42% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint
    • 8.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.5% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.8% fail on Springs
      • 2.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.7% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.42% fail on Mounting
      • 1.7% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (18 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Sub-frame
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.84% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.42% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (70% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust system (98% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Chassis condition (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Transmission
      • 3.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.0% fail on Joints
      • 0.42% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.42% fail on Joints
    • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.84% fail on Body
      • 0.42% fail on Panel
      • 0.42% fail on Other body component
    • 0.84% fail on Cabs (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Prescribed areas (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.42% fail on Doors
      • 0.42% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.42% fail on Door condition
    • 0.42% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.42% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.42% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.3% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.42% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.42% fail on Horn
    • 1.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.42% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.42% fail on Switch
    • 0.42% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.42% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.42% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.42% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 10% fail on Brakes
    • 3.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.84% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.84% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.42% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.42% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.42% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.42% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.42% fail on Rbt
          • 0.42% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.84% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.84% fail on Brake pads
    • 2.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.7% fail on Flexible brake hoses (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.42% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 8.0% fail on Visibility
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.84% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.42% fail on View to rear
      • 0.42% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.6% fail on Steering
    • 5.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.84% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.84% fail on Steering play (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Steering rack (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Power steering
      • 0.42% fail on Other components
  • 7.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.84% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.42% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.42% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.84% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.84% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 5.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.2% fail on Prescribed areas (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.42% fail on Size/type

Search Good Garages