Ford Maverick MOT Results

Registered in 1997
52.4% pass rate
from 275 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Maverick is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Anti-roll bars (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 11% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage condition (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
    • 8.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.8% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.2% fail on Spring mounting (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.7% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.5% fail on Front (180% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
  • 24% fail on Brakes (50% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (77% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Rear wheels (100% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 6.2% fail on Front wheels (93% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 10% fail on Hydraulic systems (68% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 8.7% fail on Components
        • 6.2% fail on Pipes
        • 2.2% fail on Hoses
        • 1.1% fail on Valves
        • 0.36% fail on Cylinders
      • 2.5% fail on Leaks (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (7 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Operation
    • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas (11 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (14 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Restricted movement (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on ABS
  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Battery (150% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.73% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.73% fail on Individual lamps
    • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.5% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.36% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (71% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Horn
    • 0.36% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.36% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.36% fail on Lamp
  • 14% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (140% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 12% fail on Seat belts (170% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Prescribed areas (120% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Requirements (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Attachment
    • 2.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 2.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 11% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (120% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.2% fail on Chassis
    • 0.73% fail on Body security (8 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Doors
      • 0.36% fail on Passengers other
  • 9.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.36% fail on Windscreen
  • 9.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.5% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Cap
      • 0.36% fail on System
    • 1.8% fail on Emissions (71% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 5.8% fail on Steering
    • 5.5% fail on Steering system
      • 4.0% fail on Track rod end (130% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.36% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.36% fail on Lock stop
      • 0.36% fail on Other components
        • 0.36% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.36% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 2.2% fail on Road Wheels (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 1997 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.36% fail on Towbars
    • 0.36% fail on Vehicle structure

Search Good Garages