MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Ford » Maverick » 1995

Ford Maverick MOT Results

Registered in 1995
45.2% pass rate
from 93 tests in 2020
(45% worse than other 1995 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Maverick is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Suspension (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 17% fail on Anti-roll bars (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 9.7% fail on Linkage ball joints (14 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage
    • 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Suspension arm
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.2% fail on Other suspension component (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Ball joint (13 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.1% fail on Springs
      • 1.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 25% fail on Body, chassis, structure (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Exhaust system (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Chassis condition (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Body (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Other body component (11 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Panel (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 3.2% fail on Transmission
      • 3.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.2% fail on Joints
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on System
    • 1.1% fail on Seats
      • 1.1% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 24% fail on Brakes (93% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 12% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 11% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt
          • 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.1% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.2% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 1.1% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 1.1% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.4% fail on Position lamp
    • 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.1% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 1.1% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 14% fail on Visibility
    • 7.5% fail on Wipers
    • 7.5% fail on Washers
  • 11% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 11% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 9.7% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 8.6% fail on Steering
    • 6.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Drag link end
      • 1.1% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering
      • 1.1% fail on Other components
  • 6.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.3% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 2.2% fail on Emissions not tested (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 2.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Other leaks
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages