Ford Maverick MOT Results
Registered in 199555.8% pass rate
from 43 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Maverick is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(160% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
12% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 12% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Transmission
-
7.0% fail on
Drive shafts
- 7.0% fail on Joints
-
7.0% fail on
Drive shafts
-
4.7% fail on
Chassis
- 4.7% fail on Chassis condition
- 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.3% fail on
Cabs
- 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
-
12% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
21% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
9.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
9.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 2.3% fail on All direction indicators
- 2.3% fail on Side repeaters
-
9.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
7.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
4.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.7% fail on Headlamp
-
2.3% fail on
Hazard warning
- 2.3% fail on Switch
-
2.3% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
2.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 2.3% fail on Horn
-
9.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
21% fail on
Suspension
- 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Linkage
- 2.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 2.3% fail on Ball joint
- 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
4.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.7% fail on Ball joint
- 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
-
2.3% fail on
Springs
- 2.3% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
12% fail on
Brakes
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 7.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
4.7% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.7% fail on
Rbt
- 4.7% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.7% fail on
Rbt
-
4.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.3% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.3% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
- 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
-
7.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.3% fail on Load sensing valves
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
12% fail on
Seat belts
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 12% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
12% fail on
Seat belts
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Visibility
- 7.0% fail on Washers
- 4.7% fail on Wipers
-
4.7% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Registration plates (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Tyres
- 4.7% fail on Tread depth
-
2.3% fail on
Steering
-
2.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.3% fail on Drag link end
- 2.3% fail on Track rod end
-
2.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
2.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.3% fail on
Compression ignition
- 2.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
2.3% fail on
Compression ignition
-
2.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions