MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Ford » Maverick » 1994

Ford Maverick MOT Results

Registered in 1994
52.9% pass rate
from 85 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Maverick is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Suspension (99% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 12% fail on Anti-roll bars (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Linkage ball joints (8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint (18 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 9.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.2% fail on Suspension arm
      • 1.2% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.5% fail on Springs
      • 2.4% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.2% fail on Mounting
    • 2.4% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 24% fail on Body, chassis, structure (110% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 11% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 11% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.7% fail on Transmission
      • 2.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.4% fail on Joints
      • 2.4% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.2% fail on Prop shaft
        • 1.2% fail on Joints
    • 4.7% fail on Body (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Body condition
      • 1.2% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 1.2% fail on Panel
      • 1.2% fail on Other body component
    • 1.2% fail on Chassis
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.2% fail on Towbar
      • 1.2% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 1.2% fail on Floor
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.2% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 8.2% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
          • 5.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 1.2% fail on Decelerometer
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 5.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 2.4% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 3.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.2% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.2% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 1.2% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 1.2% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 1.2% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
  • 11% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (180% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 11% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 9.4% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 8.2% fail on Visibility
    • 7.1% fail on Washers
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Driver's view
  • 7.1% fail on Steering
    • 5.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.2% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 1.2% fail on Other components
        • 1.2% fail on Steering linkage
    • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 2.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.2% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.5% fail on Tyres
    • 2.4% fail on Size/type (11 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plates
  • 2.4% fail on Road Wheels (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Attachment (10 times worse than other 1994 cars)

Search Good Garages