Ford Maverick MOT Results
Registered in 199452.5% pass rate
from 122 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Maverick is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Suspension
(55% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
13% fail on
Prescribed areas
(100% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 9.0% fail on Component mounting
- 2.5% fail on Subframe mounting
- 1.6% fail on Spring mounting
-
9.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 9.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.82% fail on Attachment
-
7.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Condition (18 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.6% fail on Condition
-
1.6% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 1.6% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
1.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
0.82% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.82% fail on Location
- 0.82% fail on Front suspension joints
-
13% fail on
Prescribed areas
(100% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
- 6.6% fail on Rear wheels
- 5.7% fail on Parking brake performance
- 4.9% fail on Front wheels
- 4.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.6% fail on Brake imbalance
-
6.6% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
6.6% fail on
Components
- 3.3% fail on Pipes
- 3.3% fail on Hoses
- 1.6% fail on Valves
- 0.82% fail on Cylinders
- 0.82% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
6.6% fail on
Components
-
0.82% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.82% fail on
Pedal
- 0.82% fail on Condition
-
0.82% fail on
Pedal
-
0.82% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.82% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
-
16% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.5% fail on Front lamps
- 0.82% fail on Rear lamps
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.5% fail on Fog lamp
- 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp
- 0.82% fail on Battery
- 0.82% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.82% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.82% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.82% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.82% fail on
Flashing type
-
13% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(160% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
13% fail on
Seat belts
(180% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 11% fail on Prescribed areas (190% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Condition
-
13% fail on
Seat belts
(180% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 8.2% fail on Washers
- 1.6% fail on Mirrors
- 0.82% fail on Windscreen
- 0.82% fail on Wipers
-
8.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 4.9% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.3% fail on Emissions
-
1.6% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.82% fail on Pipe
- 0.82% fail on System
-
6.6% fail on
Tyres
- 4.1% fail on Tread depth
- 2.5% fail on Condition
-
6.6% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 4.9% fail on Body condition
-
2.5% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.5% fail on Chassis
-
3.3% fail on
Steering
-
2.5% fail on
Steering system
- 0.82% fail on Drag link end
- 0.82% fail on Track rod end
- 0.82% fail on Steering arm
-
0.82% fail on
Other components
- 0.82% fail on Steering pivot point
-
1.6% fail on
Power steering
- 0.82% fail on Operation
- 0.82% fail on Drive system
-
2.5% fail on
Steering system
-
0.82% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.82% fail on Attachment
-
0.82% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.82% fail on Registration plate