Ford Kuga MOT Results
Registered in 201789.2% pass rate
from 37,334 tests in 2021
(16% better than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Kuga is unusually good or bad.
-
3.5% fail on
Visibility
- 2.0% fail on Wipers (26% better than other 2017 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Washers (56% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.037% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.037% fail on Windscreen
- 0.0027% fail on Driver's view
-
0.0027% fail on
View to rear
- 0.0027% fail on Mirrors
-
2.8% fail on
Tyres
(20% better than other 2017 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Tread depth
- 1.2% fail on Condition (41% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Size/type
-
2.3% fail on
Brakes
(12% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(36% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(28% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads (28% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0054% fail on Brake linings
-
0.61% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(77% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Brake discs (78% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0027% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.0027% fail on Cable
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(28% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Brake performance
(41% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Service brake performance
(41% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Rbt
(42% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Service brake performance (41% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Service brake imbalance (56% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0027% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.0027% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.0027% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0027% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.16% fail on
Rbt
(42% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.075% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(40% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Rbt (sp) (46% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.032% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.032% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.027% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.016% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.013% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.0054% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.027% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.011% fail on
Parking brake performance
(76% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.011% fail on
Rbt
(75% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Parking brake performance (70% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.011% fail on
Rbt
(75% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Service brake performance
(41% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.080% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Brake fluid (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Reservoirs (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0027% fail on Servos
-
0.024% fail on
Parking brake control
(69% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Electronic parking brake
- 0.0080% fail on Lever (87% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.021% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(66% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Pedal
- 0.0027% fail on Hand lever
- 0.016% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.013% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(80% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Electronic stability control (74% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0027% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.0027% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.0080% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.0080% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.0027% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(36% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(30% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Headlamp aim
(37% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Headlamp aim (37% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.44% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.40% fail on Headlamp
- 0.037% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.011% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.38% fail on
Direction indicators
(56% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Flashing type
(56% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Side repeaters (84% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.38% fail on
Flashing type
(56% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.080% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(43% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.080% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(43% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Rear fog lamp (43% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.080% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(43% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (65% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Stop lamp (83% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.051% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.032% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Horn
- 0.0027% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.0027% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.0080% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.0080% fail on Position lamp
-
0.0080% fail on
Reversing lamps
(77% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0080% fail on Reversing lamps (76% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0054% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.0027% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.0027% fail on Switch
-
0.82% fail on
Headlamp aim
(37% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.17% fail on Condition
- 0.0054% fail on Requirements
- 0.0027% fail on Attachment
- 0.070% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.23% fail on
Suspension
(74% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.091% fail on
Suspension arms
(60% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.029% fail on Pins and bushes (76% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Ball joint (73% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0027% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.070% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.046% fail on Shock absorbers (56% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.024% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(82% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.0080% fail on Linkage
- 0.0027% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.0027% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.0080% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.0054% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0027% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.0027% fail on
Axles
- 0.0027% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.091% fail on
Suspension arms
(60% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.19% fail on Registration plates
-
0.19% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(66% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(67% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Compression ignition
(45% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.080% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (100% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (82% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.0027% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
0.056% fail on
Spark ignition
(82% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.027% fail on Catalyst emissions (75% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (89% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.12% fail on
Compression ignition
(45% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.013% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.013% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.17% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(67% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(48% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.062% fail on
Transmission
-
0.062% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.056% fail on Joints
- 0.0027% fail on Drive shaft
- 0.0027% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.062% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.043% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.021% fail on
Body
- 0.021% fail on Other body component
-
0.016% fail on
Doors
-
0.013% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.013% fail on Door condition
-
0.0027% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.0027% fail on Door condition
- 0.0027% fail on Hinge
-
0.013% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.016% fail on Undertray
-
0.0027% fail on
Seats
- 0.0027% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.062% fail on
Transmission
-
0.083% fail on
Road Wheels
(48% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Attachment
- 0.0080% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.040% fail on
Steering
(73% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.027% fail on
Steering linkage components
(74% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Track rod end (80% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0054% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0027% fail on Intermediate drop arm
- 0.0027% fail on Steering arm
-
0.0027% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.0027% fail on Steering rack
-
0.0027% fail on
Power steering
- 0.0027% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.0027% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.0027% fail on Steering column
-
0.0027% fail on
Steering play
- 0.0027% fail on Steering rack
-
0.027% fail on
Steering linkage components
(74% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0054% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.0054% fail on Belt(s)/padding
-
0.0027% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.0027% fail on Speedometer
Read the Honest John Review
-
Ford Kuga (2013 - 2020)
Class-leading handling, practical and spacious interior, plenty of examples to choose from.