Ford Ka MOT Results
Registered in 200051.7% pass rate
from 578 tests in 2021
(15% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Ka is unusually good or bad.
-
30% fail on
Suspension
(96% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 16% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(79% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.87% fail on Ball joint
- 0.17% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
4.3% fail on
Springs
-
4.2% fail on
Coil springs
- 4.0% fail on Coil spring
- 0.17% fail on Mounting
- 0.17% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
4.2% fail on
Coil springs
-
3.3% fail on
Sub-frames
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
2.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.69% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.69% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
-
2.6% fail on
Axles
(10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Axle (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Macpherson strut
(7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
- 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.52% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.35% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.17% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint
-
11% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp
- 0.35% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.35% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.6% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.0% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.87% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.87% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.87% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.17% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.87% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.52% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.52% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.52% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.52% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.35% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (78% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.17% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.17% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamps
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
4.3% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(190% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Chassis
(170% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Chassis condition (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.69% fail on
Transmission
(77% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.69% fail on
Drive shafts
(75% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Joints (75% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.69% fail on
Drive shafts
(75% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Body
- 0.17% fail on Body condition
- 0.17% fail on Panel
- 0.17% fail on Pillar
-
0.35% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.17% fail on Pipe
- 0.17% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.35% fail on Bumpers
-
0.35% fail on
Spare wheel
(17 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Spare wheel condition
- 0.17% fail on Carrier
-
0.35% fail on
Doors
-
0.35% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.35% fail on Door condition
-
0.35% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.35% fail on Floor
-
0.17% fail on
Seats
- 0.17% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.17% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.17% fail on
Cabs
- 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
-
4.3% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(190% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
10% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(170% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
10% fail on
Seat belts
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 10% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.69% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
10% fail on
Seat belts
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
10% fail on
Visibility
- 6.1% fail on Wipers
- 4.3% fail on Washers
-
0.35% fail on
View to rear
- 0.35% fail on Mirrors
-
9.9% fail on
Brakes
-
6.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(87% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(91% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(91% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
- 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.52% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.35% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.35% fail on Service brake performance (15 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
4.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(87% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 1.2% fail on Flexible brake hoses (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.87% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.52% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.52% fail on Brake discs
-
0.35% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.35% fail on Brake pads
-
0.52% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
0.52% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.52% fail on Lever
-
0.35% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.35% fail on Pedal
- 0.17% fail on Hand lever
-
0.17% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.17% fail on Brake fluid
-
6.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.2% fail on
Tyres
- 3.1% fail on Condition
- 2.6% fail on Tread depth
- 0.52% fail on Size/type
-
3.5% fail on
Steering
-
1.9% fail on
Power steering
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Pipes and hoses (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Operation
-
1.0% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.87% fail on Steering rack
- 0.17% fail on Operation
-
0.35% fail on
Steering linkage components
(85% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Track rod end
- 0.17% fail on Locking devices
- 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.17% fail on
Steering play
- 0.17% fail on Steering rack
-
1.9% fail on
Power steering
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(74% better than other 2000 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(75% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(75% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Catalyst emissions (84% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.17% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.17% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.17% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.17% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
1.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(75% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.17% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.17% fail on Other leaks
-
2.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(75% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.87% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.87% fail on Registration plates
-
0.17% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.17% fail on Condition