Ford Galaxy MOT Results
Registered in 200549.4% pass rate
from 5,739 tests in 2017
(12% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Galaxy is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Suspension
(43% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(180% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
(180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 9.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.12% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.10% fail on Drive shafts
- 0.017% fail on Universal joint
-
9.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
(180% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(63% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (76% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (88% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Linkage condition (52% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Attachment
- 0.052% fail on Condition
-
4.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.017% fail on Condition
- 0.017% fail on Attachment
-
3.7% fail on
Shock absorbers
(170% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Coil springs
(31% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Condition (32% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Location
-
2.7% fail on
Macpherson strut
(10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Condition (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Front suspension joints (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Component mounting (62% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Subframe mounting (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Spring mounting
-
1.2% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.71% fail on Rear
- 0.52% fail on Front
-
0.26% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.017% fail on Condition
-
0.070% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.035% fail on Attachment
- 0.017% fail on Condition
- 0.017% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.052% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
0.017% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.017% fail on Condition
-
0.017% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.017% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.017% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.017% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.017% fail on
Axles
- 0.017% fail on Axle beam
-
9.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(180% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
25% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
10% fail on
Position lamps
(68% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 8.8% fail on Front lamps (77% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Rear lamps (45% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.10% fail on All position lamps
- 8.1% fail on Headlamp aim (27% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.0% fail on Stop lamp (49% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (59% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamps
(41% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp (40% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.017% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
-
0.017% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.017% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.017% fail on Switch
-
0.96% fail on
Direction indicators
(67% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Flashing type
(67% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Individual lamps (78% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.26% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.21% fail on Side repeaters (71% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Tell tales
- 0.035% fail on Switch
-
0.96% fail on
Flashing type
(67% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Battery
-
0.70% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.70% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.017% fail on Switch
- 0.17% fail on Horn (62% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.12% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.070% fail on Switch
- 0.052% fail on Lamp
- 0.087% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.035% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
10% fail on
Position lamps
(68% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
21% fail on
Brakes
(58% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(75% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Rear wheels (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Front wheels
- 0.52% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.017% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
9.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(150% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Components
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Pipes (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Cylinders
- 0.017% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.42% fail on Leaks
- 0.16% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.087% fail on Operation
-
9.1% fail on
Components
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Hub components
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads (39% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Brake discs
- 0.63% fail on Brake calipers (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Brake linings
- 0.017% fail on Brake back plates
- 1.2% fail on ABS
-
0.63% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.63% fail on Condition
-
0.58% fail on
Mechanical components
(170% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Cable (95% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Linkage (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Brake slack adjuster
- 0.017% fail on Relay lever
- 0.017% fail on Pivot
- 0.26% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.10% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.052% fail on
Components
- 0.035% fail on Hoses (17 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Servos
- 0.017% fail on Warning
- 0.017% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
- 0.017% fail on Leaks
-
0.052% fail on
Components
-
0.087% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.087% fail on
Pedal
- 0.052% fail on Condition
- 0.035% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.087% fail on
Pedal
- 0.017% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.017% fail on Additional braking devices
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(75% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
10% fail on
Tyres
(17% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Tread depth
- 5.1% fail on Condition (31% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Size/type
- 0.052% fail on Valve stem
- 0.017% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
-
7.0% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(35% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Emissions not tested (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Emissions (80% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.19% fail on System
- 0.12% fail on Cap
- 0.017% fail on Tank
- 0.017% fail on Hose
-
5.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(30% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Wipers (35% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Washers (53% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Windscreen
- 0.12% fail on Bonnet
-
3.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(130% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Doors
(150% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Passengers other (83% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Passengers front (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Body condition (83% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Seats
(170% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Passengers
- 0.070% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.070% fail on Spare wheel
- 0.017% fail on Speedometer
- 0.017% fail on Body security
-
0.017% fail on
Load security
- 0.017% fail on Tailgate
-
1.1% fail on
Doors
(150% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
2.1% fail on
Seat belts
(92% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Prescribed areas (74% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Condition (54% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Requirements (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.052% fail on
Installation check
(9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Belt(s)/padding (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(46% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.66% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (49% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Drivers airbag
-
2.1% fail on
Seat belts
(92% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Steering
(34% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Steering system
(34% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Steering rack (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Track rod end (73% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint
- 0.087% fail on Steering arm
- 0.017% fail on Drag link end
- 0.17% fail on Steering operation (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Power steering
(56% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Operation
- 0.052% fail on Other components
- 0.035% fail on Drive system (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Steering system
(34% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.68% fail on Registration plate
-
0.28% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.24% fail on Attachment
- 0.035% fail on Condition
-
0.017% fail on
Towbars
- 0.017% fail on Towbar
-
0.017% fail on
Driving Controls and Speed Limiters
- 0.017% fail on Speed limiter
Read the Honest John Review
-
Ford Galaxy (1995 - 2006)
True seven-seater that offers an enjoyable, car-like drive.