Ford Galaxy MOT Results
Registered in 200546.5% pass rate
from 3,514 tests in 2021
(19% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Galaxy is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Suspension
(52% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(86% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.97% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.057% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.057% fail on Linkage (84% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.028% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
-
8.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(38% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Ball joint
- 2.9% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Suspension arm (83% better than other 2005 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Springs
(31% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Coil springs
(32% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Coil spring (32% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Mounting
- 0.085% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
3.2% fail on
Coil springs
(32% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Macpherson strut
(7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.4% fail on
Other suspension component
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.028% fail on Other suspension component
- 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.2% fail on
Sub-frames
(150% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.057% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.028% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.028% fail on Ball joint
-
0.11% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
9.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(86% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
20% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(140% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Transmission
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 8.9% fail on Joints (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Drive shaft (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Flexible couplings (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.23% fail on Joints
- 0.028% fail on Belts
-
9.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Exhaust system (85% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.028% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.028% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
2.7% fail on
Chassis
(6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Chassis condition (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Doors
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Other passenger's door
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Door condition (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Front passenger's door
(150% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Door condition (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Driver's door
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Other passenger's door
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Seats
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Driver's seat (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.31% fail on
Body
- 0.20% fail on Panel
- 0.11% fail on Other body component
-
0.28% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.23% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.028% fail on Hose
- 0.028% fail on Pipe
-
0.23% fail on
Spare wheel
(9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Spare wheel condition (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Carrier (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.085% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.057% fail on Bracket
-
0.14% fail on
Cabs
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Bumpers
- 0.085% fail on Undertray
- 0.057% fail on Floor
-
0.057% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.057% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.028% fail on
Towbar
- 0.028% fail on Coupling
-
0.028% fail on
Load security
-
0.028% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.028% fail on Tailgate condition
-
0.028% fail on
Tailgate
-
9.2% fail on
Transmission
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
20% fail on
Brakes
(51% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(69% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 8.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Parking brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Plate brake tester
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.028% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.057% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.057% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
5.3% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
- 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.68% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.057% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.057% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.028% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.028% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
-
1.00% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.00% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.54% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.00% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
8.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(36% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads (35% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
-
0.74% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Linkage
- 0.028% fail on Brake slack adjuster
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(36% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.085% fail on Electronic stability control (78% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.77% fail on Flexible brake hoses (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.23% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Servos (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Operation
-
0.23% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.23% fail on Lever
-
0.20% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.17% fail on Hand lever
- 0.057% fail on Pedal
-
0.057% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.028% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.028% fail on Valves
-
0.028% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.028% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.028% fail on Other braking system component
-
0.028% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(69% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.3% fail on Stop lamp (54% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
(25% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim (33% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamps
(24% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp (31% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Headlamp levelling device (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Direction indicators
(60% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
(60% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Individual direction indicators (58% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Side repeaters (79% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Switch (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.028% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
(60% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (57% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.77% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.77% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.77% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.65% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.31% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.23% fail on Horn
- 0.085% fail on Trailer electrical socket (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.54% fail on
Position lamps
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Position lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.028% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.028% fail on Switch
- 0.028% fail on Rear reflectors
-
8.9% fail on
Tyres
(38% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Condition (63% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Tread depth (23% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Size/type
-
5.4% fail on
Steering
(38% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Steering gear
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Operation
-
1.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
(51% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Track rod end (63% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Drag link end
- 0.028% fail on Steering arm
-
0.028% fail on
Other components
- 0.028% fail on Steering component
- 0.028% fail on Lock stop
-
0.54% fail on
Power steering
- 0.31% fail on Other components (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Operation
- 0.057% fail on Rams
-
0.23% fail on
Steering play
- 0.23% fail on Steering rack
- 0.028% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.028% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.028% fail on Flexible coupling
-
3.8% fail on
Steering gear
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Visibility
(31% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Washers (45% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Wipers (48% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.94% fail on
View to rear
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Mirrors (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
0.43% fail on
Condition of glass
(170% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Windscreen (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Bonnet
-
5.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(72% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Seat belts
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (91% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Requirements (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Pre-tensioners (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Attachment
- 1.00% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.057% fail on
Airbags
- 0.057% fail on Drivers airbag
-
4.0% fail on
Seat belts
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(58% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(58% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(42% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.20% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (70% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.028% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.80% fail on
Spark ignition
(84% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (86% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Catalyst emissions (87% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Emissions not tested (79% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(42% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.11% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.085% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.028% fail on Other leaks
-
2.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(58% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.88% fail on Registration plates
-
0.31% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.28% fail on Attachment
- 0.028% fail on Condition
-
0.057% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.028% fail on Anchorages
- 0.028% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review
-
Ford Galaxy (1995 - 2006)
True seven-seater that offers an enjoyable, car-like drive.