Ford Galaxy MOT Results

Registered in 2005

47.0% pass rate

from 5,355 tests in 2020

(15% worse than other 2005 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Galaxy is unusually good or bad.

25% fail on Suspension (44% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (90% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 5.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 2.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.50% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  - 0.41% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.15% fail on Linkage (63% better than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.056% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 7.3% fail on Suspension arms (20% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 2.7% fail on Ball joint
  - 2.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.075% fail on Suspension arm (70% better than other 2005 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Shock absorbers (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Springs (24% better than other 2005 cars)
  - 3.2% fail on Coil springs (24% better than other 2005 cars)
    - 3.2% fail on Coil spring (24% better than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.056% fail on Mounting
  - 0.019% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
- 2.1% fail on Macpherson strut (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.71% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.056% fail on Ball joint (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.019% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.4% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.65% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.63% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.075% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.075% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.037% fail on Other suspension component
- 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings (33% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Sub-frames (97% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.62% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.037% fail on Sub-frame
  - 0.019% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.019% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.019% fail on Ball joint
- 0.15% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.019% fail on Ball joint
20% fail on Brakes (49% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 12% fail on Brake performance (74% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 9.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 9.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.037% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
  - 6.1% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 5.8% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      - 5.4% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      - 0.41% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      - 0.056% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    - 0.24% fail on Plate brake tester (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      - 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      - 0.075% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      - 0.019% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    - 0.019% fail on Decelerometer
      - 0.019% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
    - 2.7% fail on Rbt
      - 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.54% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.019% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.019% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 0.99% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.97% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.69% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 0.52% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.019% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      - 0.019% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 6.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (27% better than other 2005 cars)
    - 1.9% fail on Brake pads (26% better than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.5% fail on Brake discs
  - 1.1% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.65% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.32% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.13% fail on Linkage (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.019% fail on Rod
    - 0.019% fail on Pivot
    - 0.019% fail on Brake slack adjuster
- 1.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system (37% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.019% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.88% fail on Flexible brake hoses (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.80% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.30% fail on Lever
- 0.26% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.24% fail on Hand lever
  - 0.019% fail on Pedal
- 0.19% fail on Air and vacuum systems (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.15% fail on Servos (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.037% fail on Operation (16 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.019% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
- 0.11% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.075% fail on Brake fluid
  - 0.019% fail on Reservoirs
  - 0.019% fail on Valves
- 0.037% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
  - 0.037% fail on Other components
19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.9% fail on Stop lamp (47% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Position lamps (77% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 5.6% fail on Position lamp (78% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.075% fail on All position lamps
  - 0.019% fail on Switch
- 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim (18% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim (25% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (67% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Headlamps (32% better than other 2005 cars)
  - 3.2% fail on Headlamp (35% better than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.39% fail on Headlamp levelling device (95% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (61% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.82% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.82% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.019% fail on Switch
- 0.69% fail on Direction indicators (75% better than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.69% fail on Flashing type (75% better than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.50% fail on Individual direction indicators (73% better than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.11% fail on Side repeaters (85% better than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.075% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.62% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.43% fail on Battery(ies)
  - 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
  - 0.11% fail on Horn (75% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
  - 0.056% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  - 0.019% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.037% fail on Outline marker lamps
  - 0.037% fail on Outline marker lamp
- 0.037% fail on Hazard warning
  - 0.037% fail on Switch
- 0.019% fail on Rear reflectors
19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 9.9% fail on Transmission (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 9.6% fail on Drive shafts (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 9.5% fail on Joints (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.056% fail on Drive shaft
    - 0.037% fail on Flexible couplings
  - 0.32% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.32% fail on Joints (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.019% fail on Belts
- 5.5% fail on Exhaust system (84% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Chassis (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.6% fail on Chassis condition (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.037% fail on Strengthening plate (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Doors (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.65% fail on Other passenger's door (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.65% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.37% fail on Driver's door (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.34% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.037% fail on Hinge (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.35% fail on Front passenger's door (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.35% fail on Door condition (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.35% fail on Driver's seat (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.28% fail on Passenger's seat (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.19% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
  - 0.075% fail on System
  - 0.037% fail on Hose
  - 0.019% fail on Pipe
- 0.19% fail on Body
  - 0.11% fail on Other body component
  - 0.075% fail on Panel
  - 0.019% fail on Body condition
- 0.15% fail on Bumpers
- 0.11% fail on Spare wheel (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.075% fail on Spare wheel condition (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.037% fail on Carrier
- 0.093% fail on Engine mounting
  - 0.075% fail on Engine mounting condition
  - 0.019% fail on Bracket
- 0.056% fail on Floor
- 0.056% fail on Undertray
- 0.037% fail on Towbar
  - 0.019% fail on Other towbar components
  - 0.019% fail on Vehicle structure
- 0.037% fail on Boot lid
  - 0.037% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.037% fail on Cabs
  - 0.037% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.019% fail on Load security
  - 0.019% fail on Loading door
8.8% fail on Tyres (18% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Tread depth
- 4.6% fail on Condition (48% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Size/type
4.8% fail on Visibility (37% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Wipers (44% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Washers (48% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.67% fail on View to rear (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.67% fail on Mirrors (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.26% fail on Windscreen
  - 0.037% fail on Window (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Driver's view
- 0.11% fail on Bonnet
4.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (57% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Seat belts (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.0% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.019% fail on Attachment
  - 0.019% fail on Pre-tensioners
- 0.90% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (41% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Airbags
  - 0.075% fail on Drivers airbag
4.2% fail on Steering
- 2.7% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 2.6% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.056% fail on Operation
- 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components (58% better than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.84% fail on Track rod end (70% better than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.34% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.056% fail on Drag link end
  - 0.056% fail on Locking devices
  - 0.037% fail on Steering arm
  - 0.019% fail on Other components
    - 0.019% fail on Steering linkage
- 0.45% fail on Power steering
  - 0.22% fail on Operation (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.21% fail on Other components
  - 0.037% fail on Rams
  - 0.019% fail on Pump
- 0.17% fail on Steering play
  - 0.17% fail on Steering rack
- 0.019% fail on Steering wheel
2.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (61% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (64% better than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.6% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.84% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.65% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    - 0.093% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (81% better than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.056% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    - 0.056% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    - 0.037% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.037% fail on Catalytic converter
  - 0.78% fail on Spark ignition (84% better than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.47% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (83% better than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.19% fail on Catalyst emissions (91% better than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.17% fail on Emissions not tested (73% better than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.037% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.037% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.41% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.34% fail on Engine oil leaks
  - 0.037% fail on Other leaks
  - 0.019% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  - 0.019% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
0.60% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.60% fail on Registration plates
0.28% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.24% fail on Attachment
- 0.037% fail on Condition
0.11% fail on Seat belt installation check (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Belt(s)/padding (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Anchorages
0.019% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.019% fail on Speedometer