Ford Galaxy MOT Results
Registered in 200446.7% pass rate
from 2,415 tests in 2021
(17% worse than other 2004 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Galaxy is unusually good or bad.
-
30% fail on
Suspension
(71% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(69% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (76% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Ball joint (97% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.29% fail on Linkage
- 0.21% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.083% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.041% fail on Anti-roll bar
-
8.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(42% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Ball joint
- 3.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.17% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.041% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
3.5% fail on
Springs
-
3.4% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.4% fail on Coil spring
- 0.12% fail on Mounting
- 0.083% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
3.4% fail on
Coil springs
-
2.4% fail on
Macpherson strut
(9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes (17 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.083% fail on Ball joint (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.4% fail on
Sub-frames
(3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.083% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.041% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.041% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Other suspension component
(3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.083% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.083% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.66% fail on Wheel bearings (55% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.041% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.041% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.041% fail on Suspension unit
-
22% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(140% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Transmission
(170% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(180% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 8.9% fail on Joints (180% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.083% fail on Flexible couplings (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.12% fail on Joints
-
8.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(180% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Exhaust system (91% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.041% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 0.041% fail on Strengthening plate
-
4.1% fail on
Chassis
(7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Chassis condition (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Strengthening plate
-
0.95% fail on
Doors
(83% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Front passenger's door
(160% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Door condition (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.33% fail on Door condition
-
0.29% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.25% fail on Door condition
- 0.041% fail on Hinge
-
0.41% fail on
Front passenger's door
(160% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.50% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.041% fail on Hose
- 0.041% fail on System
-
0.41% fail on
Cabs
(9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Bumpers
-
0.29% fail on
Body
- 0.17% fail on Panel
- 0.083% fail on Other body component
- 0.041% fail on Body condition
-
0.21% fail on
Seats
- 0.12% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.083% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.17% fail on Floor (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.083% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.083% fail on Spare wheel condition (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.083% fail on
Load security
(11 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.041% fail on Tailgate condition
- 0.041% fail on Loading door
-
0.041% fail on
Tailgate
-
0.083% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.083% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.041% fail on
Towbar
- 0.041% fail on Other towbar components
- 0.041% fail on Passenger compartment
-
9.1% fail on
Transmission
(170% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
18% fail on
Brakes
(31% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Brake performance
(30% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(73% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (84% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
4.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
(180% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Rbt
(180% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.041% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.12% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.12% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Rbt
(180% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
- 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.46% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.041% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.041% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
-
1.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.75% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.41% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.37% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
7.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(73% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (52% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
- 0.041% fail on Brake linings
-
1.5% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.4% fail on Brake discs
- 0.041% fail on Brake drums
-
0.58% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(150% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Cable
- 0.12% fail on Lever
- 0.041% fail on Linkage
- 0.041% fail on Brake slack adjuster
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.6% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(72% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system (94% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.083% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.041% fail on Electronic braking system
- 1.4% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(130% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.25% fail on Lever
-
0.17% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.083% fail on Pedal
- 0.083% fail on Hand lever
-
0.17% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.083% fail on Servos
- 0.041% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
- 0.041% fail on Leaks
-
0.041% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.041% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.041% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.041% fail on Additional braking device
-
9.8% fail on
Brake performance
(30% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.0% fail on Stop lamp (37% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp levelling device (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Dipswitch
-
5.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
(29% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim (31% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(48% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
(48% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.21% fail on Side repeaters (79% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.083% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
(48% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.95% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.95% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.95% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.91% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (61% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.58% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.083% fail on Horn
- 0.041% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.33% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.33% fail on Position lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.083% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.041% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
0.041% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.041% fail on Switch
-
8.4% fail on
Tyres
(35% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Condition (55% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Tread depth
- 0.37% fail on Size/type
-
6.9% fail on
Steering
(52% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Steering gear
(4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Operation
-
1.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
(48% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Track rod end (63% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Ball joint
- 0.12% fail on Drag link end
- 0.041% fail on Steering arm
-
0.75% fail on
Power steering
(130% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Operation
- 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.041% fail on Rams
-
0.46% fail on
Steering play
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.041% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.041% fail on Steering column
-
4.9% fail on
Steering gear
(4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Visibility
(31% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Washers (35% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Wipers (45% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
View to rear
(130% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Mirrors
- 0.041% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
0.29% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.25% fail on Windscreen
- 0.041% fail on Window
- 0.12% fail on Bonnet
-
5.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(62% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (90% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Requirements (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.083% fail on Attachment
- 1.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
3.7% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(51% better than other 2004 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(53% better than other 2004 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Compression ignition
(61% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.041% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.041% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.041% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
1.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(79% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (77% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Catalyst emissions (84% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested (78% better than other 2004 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Compression ignition
(61% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.37% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.041% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.041% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
0.041% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.041% fail on Sound deadening material
-
3.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(53% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.87% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.87% fail on Registration plates
-
0.33% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
- 0.041% fail on Condition
-
0.083% fail on
Seat belt installation check
(5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Anchorages
- 0.041% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review
-
Ford Galaxy (1995 - 2006)
True seven-seater that offers an enjoyable, car-like drive.