MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Ford » Galaxy » 2000

Ford Galaxy MOT Results

Registered in 2000
49.3% pass rate
from 227 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Galaxy is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension (73% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.88% fail on Ball joint
    • 5.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
    • 5.3% fail on Springs
      • 4.8% fail on Coil springs
        • 4.0% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.88% fail on Mounting (16 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.0% fail on Macpherson strut (16 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes (19 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Macpherson strut (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.8% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.8% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.88% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.88% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.44% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.88% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.88% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.88% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.44% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.44% fail on Position lamp
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 6.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 5.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.88% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.88% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.44% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 3.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.88% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.88% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.44% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.44% fail on Operation
    • 0.44% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.44% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (63% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.8% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Chassis condition (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Transmission
      • 4.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.4% fail on Joints
    • 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.3% fail on Doors
      • 0.44% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.44% fail on Door condition
      • 0.44% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.44% fail on Door condition
      • 0.44% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.44% fail on Door condition
    • 0.88% fail on Cabs (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.44% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.44% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.44% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.44% fail on Seats
      • 0.44% fail on Driver's seat
  • 11% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Steering gear (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Steering linkage components (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.88% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.44% fail on Power steering
      • 0.44% fail on Other components
    • 0.44% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.44% fail on Steering play
      • 0.44% fail on Steering rack
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 6.6% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.88% fail on View to rear
      • 0.88% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.44% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Condition
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
  • 7.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
      • 0.44% fail on Requirements
    • 2.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.88% fail on Airbags (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Drivers airbag (15 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 5.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.44% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.44% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.44% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 2.2% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Emissions not tested (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.88% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.88% fail on Engine oil leaks
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages