Ford Galaxy MOT Results

Registered in 1999
40.2% pass rate
from 1,187 tests in 2017
(23% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Galaxy is unusually good or bad.

  • 35% fail on Suspension (63% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 15% fail on Prescribed areas (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 8.3% fail on Subframe mounting (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Component mounting (55% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Spring mounting
    • 13% fail on Anti-roll bars (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 10% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Attachment (200% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage condition
    • 7.2% fail on Drive shafts (82% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Front drive shafts (85% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 7.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (86% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Coil springs (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Location
    • 5.1% fail on Macpherson strut (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Condition (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 2.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.67% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.42% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
      • 0.084% fail on Attachment
    • 0.51% fail on Wheel bearings (73% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Front
      • 0.084% fail on Rear
    • 0.17% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.084% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.084% fail on Attachment
  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (31% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (87% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Rear lamps (60% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (31% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Direction indicators (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Flashing type (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 5.6% fail on Individual lamps (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.084% fail on Tell tales
    • 3.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Fog lamp (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (57% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Battery (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps (46% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp (49% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.084% fail on Switch
    • 0.25% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.17% fail on Lamp
      • 0.084% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.17% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.17% fail on Horn
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 8.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.8% fail on Components
        • 6.2% fail on Pipes (49% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Hoses
        • 0.25% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.084% fail on Servos
      • 0.25% fail on Operation
      • 0.25% fail on Leaks
      • 0.084% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 6.3% fail on Brake performance (33% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.1% fail on Front wheels (66% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.34% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.1% fail on ABS (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Hub components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.34% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.42% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.42% fail on Cable
    • 0.34% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on Air and vacuum systems (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Leaks (21 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Operation
    • 0.084% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.084% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.084% fail on Pedal
        • 0.084% fail on Condition
    • 0.084% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.084% fail on Restricted movement
  • 17% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (47% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 10% fail on Emissions (48% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Exhaust system (55% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.59% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.25% fail on Cap
      • 0.17% fail on System
      • 0.084% fail on Hose
      • 0.084% fail on Pipe
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road (37% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Wipers (39% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.25% fail on Bonnet
  • 11% fail on Steering (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 10% fail on Steering system (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Track rod end (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Free play
        • 0.25% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.17% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.084% fail on Other components
        • 0.084% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering
      • 0.34% fail on Operation
      • 0.25% fail on Drive system (19 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.25% fail on Other components
      • 0.084% fail on Pump
      • 0.084% fail on Rams
    • 0.17% fail on Steering control
      • 0.17% fail on Steering column
  • 10% fail on Tyres (26% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 5.1% fail on Condition (43% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Size/type
    • 0.17% fail on Valve stem
  • 7.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (77% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Body condition (80% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Vehicle structure (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Chassis (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Doors
      • 0.76% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.17% fail on Drivers
      • 0.084% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.17% fail on Seats
      • 0.084% fail on Passengers
      • 0.084% fail on Drivers
    • 0.084% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.084% fail on Body security
  • 6.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.76% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Requirements
    • 2.5% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 2.4% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.084% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 1.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.42% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.42% fail on Attachment
  • 0.084% fail on Towbars
    • 0.084% fail on Vehicle structure
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages