Ford Galaxy MOT Results

Registered in 1999
42.4% pass rate
from 483 tests in 2020
(28% worse than other 1999 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Galaxy is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Suspension (63% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 12% fail on Anti-roll bars (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.21% fail on Linkage
    • 11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.41% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 5.2% fail on Macpherson strut (18 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Pins and bushes (30 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Macpherson strut (17 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.5% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.1% fail on Springs
      • 2.9% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.9% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.21% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.83% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.21% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.62% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (47% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Stop lamp (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Direction indicators (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Flashing type (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Side repeaters
    • 5.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Position lamps (78% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Position lamp (82% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (55% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.21% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (65% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim (68% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.0% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.21% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.21% fail on Horn
    • 0.62% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.62% fail on Switch
    • 0.21% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.21% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 22% fail on Brakes (52% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt
          • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.83% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.62% fail on Service brake performance (80% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt (79% better than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.41% fail on Service brake performance (83% better than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.62% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (96% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.83% fail on Air and vacuum systems (19 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Operation
      • 0.21% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.21% fail on Leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Servos
    • 0.62% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.41% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.21% fail on Pedal
      • 0.21% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.21% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.21% fail on Lever
    • 0.21% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 21% fail on Body, chassis, structure (89% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Exhaust system (94% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Transmission (66% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 5.0% fail on Joints
        • 0.21% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.41% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.41% fail on Joints
    • 5.0% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (200% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.83% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.21% fail on System
    • 0.62% fail on Doors
      • 0.62% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.62% fail on Door condition
      • 0.21% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.21% fail on Door condition
    • 0.41% fail on Cabs
      • 0.41% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.21% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.21% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.21% fail on Carrier
    • 0.21% fail on Body
      • 0.21% fail on Panel
    • 0.21% fail on Floor
    • 0.21% fail on Seats
      • 0.21% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.21% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.21% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.21% fail on Undertray
  • 14% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (53% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 13% fail on Exhaust emissions (57% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 11% fail on Spark ignition (42% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 8.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.41% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.41% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 2.3% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.21% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.83% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.41% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Other leaks
  • 12% fail on Visibility (55% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Wipers (64% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.83% fail on View to rear
      • 0.83% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.41% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.21% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.21% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.21% fail on Windscreen
  • 9.9% fail on Steering (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Steering linkage components (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Track rod end (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint
    • 4.8% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Power steering
      • 0.21% fail on Operation
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
    • 0.41% fail on Steering play
      • 0.41% fail on Steering rack
  • 7.7% fail on Tyres
    • 5.2% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.41% fail on Size/type
  • 7.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
      • 0.41% fail on Requirements (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.21% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages