Ford Galaxy MOT Results
Registered in 199754.8% pass rate
from 104 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Galaxy is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 7.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.9% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.96% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.96% fail on Horn
-
0.96% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.96% fail on Headlamp
-
0.96% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.96% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.96% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.96% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
6.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(200% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.96% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.96% fail on Ball joint
- 0.96% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 5.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
4.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.8% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.96% fail on Ball joint
- 0.96% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 3.8% fail on Wheel bearings
-
2.9% fail on
Sub-frames
(3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(200% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
17% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(80% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.96% fail on Joints
-
7.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.9% fail on
Chassis
- 1.9% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.9% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.9% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (7 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.96% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.96% fail on
Doors
-
0.96% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.96% fail on Door condition
-
0.96% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.96% fail on
Seats
- 0.96% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.96% fail on Undertray
-
8.7% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
7.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.96% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
- 0.96% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.96% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
- 1.9% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
- 0.96% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.96% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
-
0.96% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.96% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.9% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
- 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Brake pads (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.96% fail on Brake discs
-
3.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.96% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.96% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.96% fail on Other braking system component
-
0.96% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
7.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Steering
(190% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Steering gear
(7 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 9.6% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.9% fail on Track rod end
-
0.96% fail on
Power steering
- 0.96% fail on Operation
- 0.96% fail on Rams
-
9.6% fail on
Steering gear
(7 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
11% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.7% fail on
Spark ignition
- 7.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.96% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.96% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.9% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.96% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.96% fail on Emissions not tested
-
8.7% fail on
Spark ignition
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.8% fail on
Visibility
- 4.8% fail on Wipers
- 0.96% fail on Washers
-
4.8% fail on
Tyres
- 3.8% fail on Condition
- 1.9% fail on Tread depth
-
3.8% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Registration plates (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 2.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
Read the Honest John Review
-
Ford Galaxy (1995 - 2006)
True seven-seater that offers an enjoyable, car-like drive.