Ford Fusion MOT Results
Registered in 201274.5% pass rate
from 846 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Fusion is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(43% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Stop lamp (83% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(110% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Flashing type
(110% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.12% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.4% fail on
Flashing type
(110% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.35% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp
-
2.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.24% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.12% fail on Horn
- 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.12% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
5.7% fail on
Brakes
- 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.83% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.83% fail on
Rbt
- 0.83% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.83% fail on
Rbt
-
0.59% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.59% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.47% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.59% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.47% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.47% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.24% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.24% fail on
Rbt
- 0.12% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.24% fail on
Rbt
-
0.83% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(58% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(66% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Brake pads (66% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.59% fail on Brake discs
-
0.71% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(66% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.59% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.12% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.12% fail on Lever
- 0.12% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
4.8% fail on
Visibility
- 3.9% fail on Wipers (71% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Washers (61% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
View to rear
- 0.12% fail on Mirrors
-
4.1% fail on
Suspension
(56% better than other 2012 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Springs
(76% better than other 2012 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
(76% better than other 2012 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Coil spring (75% better than other 2012 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
(76% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(77% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.24% fail on
Suspension arms
(92% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.7% fail on
Tyres
(51% better than other 2012 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth
- 1.2% fail on Condition (56% better than other 2012 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(53% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Transmission
-
0.47% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.24% fail on Drive shaft (28 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Joints
-
0.47% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.24% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.24% fail on
Doors
-
0.24% fail on
Driver's door
(5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Driver's door
(5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.12% fail on Pipe
- 0.12% fail on Bumpers
-
0.47% fail on
Transmission
-
0.24% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.24% fail on Registration plates
-
0.24% fail on
Steering
(85% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.12% fail on Steering rack
-
0.12% fail on
Power steering
- 0.12% fail on Other components
-
0.12% fail on
Steering gear
-
0.12% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.12% fail on Speedometer
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.12% fail on Condition
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.12% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.12% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.12% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
0.12% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
Read the Honest John Review
-
Ford Fusion (2002 - 2012)
Versatile interior. Easy to get in and out of. Reasonably sized load area with no lip. Four-star crash test rating, economical TDCI diesels.