MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Ford » Fusion » 2010

Ford Fusion MOT Results

Registered in 2010
68.1% pass rate
from 6,220 tests in 2021
(12% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Fusion is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Individual direction indicators (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps (27% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp (23% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.90% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.27% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.016% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.14% fail on Electrical equipment (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Horn
      • 0.032% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.016% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.016% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.048% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.032% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.016% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.016% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.016% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.016% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.016% fail on Switch
  • 7.6% fail on Brakes
    • 5.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Brake performance (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Service brake performance (62% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Rbt (61% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.64% fail on Service brake performance (62% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance (51% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.016% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.71% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (61% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Rbt (sp) (58% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.50% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.34% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.37% fail on Brake performance not tested (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Parking brake performance (68% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt (66% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance (71% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.064% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.80% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.016% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.71% fail on Brake linings and pads (66% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Brake pads (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.032% fail on Cable
    • 0.32% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (45% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.016% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.11% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Pedal
      • 0.048% fail on Hand lever (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.080% fail on Parking brake control (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Lever (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.080% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.032% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.032% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.032% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.016% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.016% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.016% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.016% fail on Servos
  • 5.2% fail on Visibility
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers (43% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (39% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on View to rear
      • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.064% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.064% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.016% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.1% fail on Suspension (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Springs (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Coil springs (62% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Coil spring (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Anti-roll bars (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage ball joints (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Linkage
      • 0.048% fail on Ball joint dust cover (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.55% fail on Suspension arms (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.048% fail on Pins and bushes (97% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint (98% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Shock absorbers (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.080% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.064% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.016% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.048% fail on Other suspension component (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.016% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.032% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.016% fail on Axles
      • 0.016% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.016% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
  • 2.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (27% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.74% fail on Transmission (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Drive shafts (51% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Joints (53% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.032% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.19% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.13% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.032% fail on Hose
      • 0.016% fail on Pipe
      • 0.016% fail on System
    • 0.096% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.096% fail on Seats
      • 0.064% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.032% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.048% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.032% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.016% fail on Bracket
    • 0.048% fail on Doors (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.048% fail on Door condition
    • 0.032% fail on Body
      • 0.016% fail on Panel
      • 0.016% fail on Other body component
    • 0.016% fail on Chassis
      • 0.016% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.016% fail on Undertray
  • 2.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (42% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Spark ignition (54% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (33% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Catalyst emissions (62% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.080% fail on Emissions not tested (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Compression ignition (28% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.096% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (80% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.048% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.016% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.16% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.080% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.048% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.032% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.032% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.016% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.016% fail on Undertray
  • 1.6% fail on Steering (33% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end (34% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.032% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.35% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.35% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.064% fail on Power steering
      • 0.032% fail on Operation
      • 0.016% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.016% fail on Rams
      • 0.016% fail on Other components
    • 0.032% fail on Steering play
      • 0.032% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.23% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.23% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.16% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Seat belts (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Requirements
    • 0.032% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (93% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.064% fail on Attachment (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.048% fail on Condition
  • 0.016% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.016% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • Ford Fusion (2002 - 2012)
    Versatile interior. Easy to get in and out of. Reasonably sized load area with no lip. Four-star crash test rating, economical TDCI diesels.

    Search Good Garages