Ford Fusion MOT Results

Registered in 2010
75.4% pass rate
from 5,653 tests in 2017
(17% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Fusion is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (13% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Stop lamp (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (22% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Individual lamps (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on All direction indicators (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.035% fail on Side repeaters (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (26% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.018% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.018% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.0% fail on Position lamps (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Front lamps (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.035% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.16% fail on Rear reflectors (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.053% fail on Horn
    • 0.053% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 4.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Washers (41% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres (37% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth (33% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Condition (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
    • 0.035% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.4% fail on Brakes (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Components (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Pipes (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Hoses
        • 0.018% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.18% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 1.0% fail on Hub components (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Brake pads (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.57% fail on Brake performance (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Front wheels (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Rear wheels (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.053% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.018% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on ABS
    • 0.088% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.088% fail on Pedal
        • 0.053% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.035% fail on Condition
    • 0.018% fail on Restricted movement
  • 2.6% fail on Suspension (68% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Rear (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Front
    • 0.90% fail on Coil springs (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Location
    • 0.19% fail on Anti-roll bars (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.018% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.088% fail on Drive shafts (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Front drive shafts (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.071% fail on Constant velocity joints (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.018% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.018% fail on General condition
    • 0.018% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.018% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.018% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 1.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.053% fail on Emissions (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.053% fail on Fuel system (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on System
      • 0.018% fail on Tank
  • 0.41% fail on Steering (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Operation (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.018% fail on Other components
    • 0.19% fail on Steering system (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.088% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Steering arm
  • 0.21% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.088% fail on Seats
      • 0.071% fail on Drivers
      • 0.018% fail on Passengers
    • 0.071% fail on Body condition
    • 0.018% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.018% fail on Body security
    • 0.018% fail on Doors
      • 0.018% fail on Passengers other
  • 0.18% fail on Registration plates and VIN (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Registration plate (60% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.14% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
      • 0.018% fail on Requirements
    • 0.018% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.018% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.088% fail on Road Wheels (71% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Attachment
    • 0.018% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Ford Fusion (2002 - 2012)
    Versatile interior. Easy to get in and out of. Reasonably sized load area with no lip. Four-star crash test rating, economical TDCI diesels.

    Search Good Garages